Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.image.processing > #4046

abstract/compromise working spaces

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Followups directed to: sci.engr.color, sci.image.processing, rec.photo.digital, comp.graphics.apps.gimp, rec.photo.darkroom

Show all headers | View raw

there may be a lack of colorimetric working spaces in the image 
manipulation programs I currently know

spaces uvL,xyY,XYZ,CIECAM,CIELUV,CIELAB, etc. are more device 
independent and more relational to vision, manipulation algorithms are 
more related to vision in this case, and you could use an monitor on/off 
profile to see what you are doing

I see the value of a output device working space in addition to a 
monitor profile for hard proofing, something you can get your hands on

I see the value monitor device working space for soft proofing, 
something you can see

I see the value of abstract/compromise working spaces for consumer use, 
until the systems catch up to professional

I see the value of more abstract/compromise working spaces for 
professional digital capture paradigms that can't be characterized, like 
no time to capture a target and measure it for the particular scene(s) 
being captured

is it just my distance from the industry or is colorimetry still 
something that it being avoided?

-- 
Dale
http://www.dalekelly.org

Back to sci.image.processing | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

abstract/compromise working spaces Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-14 17:48 -0400
  Re: abstract/compromise working spaces Eric Stevens <eric.stevens@sum.co.nz> - 2015-10-15 12:47 +1300
    Re: abstract/compromise working spaces Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> - 2015-10-14 20:53 -0400

csiph-web