Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742549

Re: fast divider?

Subject Re: fast divider?
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design
References (8 earlier) <654nskl6fe22od11in65f4mm254qnuc6p5@4ax.com> <10qgb98$39jr5$1@dont-email.me> <6honskhhs9lpc60c05dcn16v9pooqe8udp@4ax.com> <10qh0vt$3hq3m$1@dont-email.me> <1h2oskp2k3cgih7asalgoqkcaa0pnt0248@4ax.com>
From Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com>
Date 2026-03-31 14:25 -0700
Message-ID <ZPCcnSHO9a5DplH0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 03/31/2026 10:57 AM, john larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:41:17 -0700, Buzz McCool
> <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/31/2026 8:14 AM, john larkin wrote:
>>> It is an interesting question: does one understand then invent, or
>>> invent and then understand? Great scientific and practical ideas seem
>>> to be mostly invent or discover first, understand after.
>>
>> It's been said the steam engine did far more for engineering than
>> engineering did for the steam engine.
>>
>
> Ditto thermodynamics.
>
> Einstein's theories of relativity seem to be the rare case of
> predicting effects before they were observed, some decades before they
> could be demonstrated.
>
> John Larkin
> Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center
> Lunatic Fringe Electronics
>

The periodic table of elements is a usual example.

There were holes in it placeholders for elements
or atomic species, later discovered.

The usual account since antiquity was that stringed
musical instruments could be made reproducible their
sound according to a theory of construction.

That physics or its science has got a ways ahead of
the mathematics, still has that there are tons and
tons of old-fashioned and considered obsolete the
physics, for example "Faraday Rotation", that simply
enough just need mathematics to bring them right back.

Otherwise though it's usual that only after the
un-attainable sort of theoretical results of the
fundamental physics of the 20'th century was it so
that experiment can't explain itself.

The motive power of steam engines definitely made
much for the study of aspects of the triple point
of water, yet as well, accounts of pneumatics and
the letter-tube delivery systems or even how a
train locomotive makes its way up the tracks,
for example from the World Factbook of 1846,
make for theory meeting practice.


Here are some podcasts or video essays I recently
recorded.

"Reading Foundations: double relativity"
"Reading Foundations: continuous quanta"

Some books looked at include "The Grand Contraption"
and "The Powers that Be".



Back to the idea of implementing a divider circuit,
it's kind of funny that there isn't really a great
example of an analog divider circuit that's sort of
ideal and efficient, besides as for usual accounts
of amplifiers and attenuators and so on. There are
integrators and the like, accumulators, there's a
place on the chart of ideal electrical components
looking to be filled with a rational divider.



Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 11:39 -0700
  Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 16:44 +1100
    Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-28 14:38 -0700
      Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-29 15:52 +1100
        Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 08:18 -0700
          Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-30 16:42 +1100
            Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 08:00 -0700
              Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 16:35 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 02:40 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 22:30 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 08:14 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-31 10:41 -0700
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 10:57 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 14:25 -0700
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 15:16 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 16:17 +1100
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 16:05 +1100
                Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 02:04 -0700
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 07:25 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-01 16:07 +0000
                Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 09:37 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 15:54 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 01:06 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 02:13 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 09:12 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 14:41 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 07:53 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 02:21 +1100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 08:57 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 04:05 +1100
                Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-02 13:17 -0400
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 11:20 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-09 10:55 -0400
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 10:34 -0700
                Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-09 13:43 -0400
                Re: fast divider? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 19:07 +0100
                Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 13:47 -0700

csiph-web