Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742549
| Subject | Re: fast divider? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.design |
| References | (8 earlier) <654nskl6fe22od11in65f4mm254qnuc6p5@4ax.com> <10qgb98$39jr5$1@dont-email.me> <6honskhhs9lpc60c05dcn16v9pooqe8udp@4ax.com> <10qh0vt$3hq3m$1@dont-email.me> <1h2oskp2k3cgih7asalgoqkcaa0pnt0248@4ax.com> |
| From | Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2026-03-31 14:25 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <ZPCcnSHO9a5DplH0nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
On 03/31/2026 10:57 AM, john larkin wrote: > On Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:41:17 -0700, Buzz McCool > <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> On 3/31/2026 8:14 AM, john larkin wrote: >>> It is an interesting question: does one understand then invent, or >>> invent and then understand? Great scientific and practical ideas seem >>> to be mostly invent or discover first, understand after. >> >> It's been said the steam engine did far more for engineering than >> engineering did for the steam engine. >> > > Ditto thermodynamics. > > Einstein's theories of relativity seem to be the rare case of > predicting effects before they were observed, some decades before they > could be demonstrated. > > John Larkin > Highland Tech Glen Canyon Design Center > Lunatic Fringe Electronics > The periodic table of elements is a usual example. There were holes in it placeholders for elements or atomic species, later discovered. The usual account since antiquity was that stringed musical instruments could be made reproducible their sound according to a theory of construction. That physics or its science has got a ways ahead of the mathematics, still has that there are tons and tons of old-fashioned and considered obsolete the physics, for example "Faraday Rotation", that simply enough just need mathematics to bring them right back. Otherwise though it's usual that only after the un-attainable sort of theoretical results of the fundamental physics of the 20'th century was it so that experiment can't explain itself. The motive power of steam engines definitely made much for the study of aspects of the triple point of water, yet as well, accounts of pneumatics and the letter-tube delivery systems or even how a train locomotive makes its way up the tracks, for example from the World Factbook of 1846, make for theory meeting practice. Here are some podcasts or video essays I recently recorded. "Reading Foundations: double relativity" "Reading Foundations: continuous quanta" Some books looked at include "The Grand Contraption" and "The Powers that Be". Back to the idea of implementing a divider circuit, it's kind of funny that there isn't really a great example of an analog divider circuit that's sort of ideal and efficient, besides as for usual accounts of amplifiers and attenuators and so on. There are integrators and the like, accumulators, there's a place on the chart of ideal electrical components looking to be filled with a rational divider.
Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-27 11:39 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-28 16:44 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-28 14:38 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-29 15:52 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-29 08:18 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-30 16:42 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-30 08:00 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 16:35 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 02:40 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-03-31 22:30 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 08:14 -0700
Re: fast divider? Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-03-31 10:41 -0700
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 10:57 -0700
Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-03-31 14:25 -0700
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-03-31 15:16 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 16:17 +1100
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 16:05 +1100
Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 02:04 -0700
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 07:25 -0700
Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-01 16:07 +0000
Re: fast divider? Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-01 09:37 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-01 15:54 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 01:06 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 02:13 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-01 09:12 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-02 14:41 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 07:53 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 02:21 +1100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 08:57 -0700
Re: fast divider? Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> - 2026-04-03 04:05 +1100
Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-02 13:17 -0400
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 11:20 -0700
Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-09 10:55 -0400
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 10:34 -0700
Re: fast divider? Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2026-04-09 13:43 -0400
Re: fast divider? John R Walliker <jrwalliker@gmail.com> - 2026-04-09 19:07 +0100
Re: fast divider? john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-09 13:47 -0700
csiph-web