Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > sci.electronics.design > #742636

Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage

Show all headers | View raw

On 04/02/2026 09:17 AM, Jan Panteltje wrote:
>> john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>wrote:
>>> On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 22:54:38 -0400, bitrex <user@example.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Just the worst camerawork/editing I think I've ever seen on a space
>>> launch! Total amateur hour.
>>>
>>> Booster cam glitches out, launch pad camera doesn't pan up, rocket out
>>> of frame, wobbly, zoomed too close or too far, digital artifacts,
>>> several pointless cuts in the span of a few seconds, then they cut to
>>> the crowd right at SRB sep.
>>>
>>> The broadcast footage of STS-1 in 1981 was way better. Even Apollo 11
>>> was way better..
>>>
>>> 'Integrity' is a terrible name for a ship but though the rocket will
>>> never look as sci-fi cool as the Shuttle it's not entirely unattractive,
>>> in kind of a chunky, orange sort of way.
>>
>> The mission is absurd. NASA is just a money-burning bureaucracy.
>>
>
>   Just wrote this to alt.politics.trump:
> Future? President Trump to be first human on Mars
> After noting he will be killed once he personally enlist to fight Iran,
> President trump orders NASA to carry his remains on the next Mars rover
> and then bury it in a small golden coffin so as to be the first Human on Mars
>
>
> Anyways
> soon we will see the anti-graffiti drive,..
> no more rockets, or maybe nuclear propulsion,
> long ago NASA did experiments with that.
> As to cameras, sure, when the moon landings happened I was in the TV head control room here relaying it to the people.
> Nothing new...
> Just stay cool and concentrated, no errors allowed..
> All BW coming from the moon back then.
> Indeed disruptions in digital networks can give huge artefacts.
> OTOH I did see it start now on BBC and it looked impressive, big.
>
> Humans are only at the beginning of space exploration, just a few thousand years from the stone-age..
> Things evolve, exponentially in time?
>

Shouldn't it mostly be pictures/video of the Moon?

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

OT: Artemis II network TV coverage bitrex <user@example.net> - 2026-04-01 22:54 -0400
  Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2026-04-02 00:36 -0700
  Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-04-02 10:22 +0100
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-02 09:53 +0000
      Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-04-03 13:34 +0100
        Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-03 17:11 +0000
          Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Martin Brown <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> - 2026-04-04 17:13 +0100
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage bitrex <user@example.net> - 2026-04-02 16:10 -0400
  Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 08:12 -0700
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-02 16:17 +0000
      Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 09:24 -0700
        Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-02 18:05 +0000
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-02 17:02 +0000
      Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Ross Finlayson <ross.a.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2026-04-02 11:26 -0700
        Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Nioclás Pól Caileán de Ghloucester <thanks-to@Taf.com> - 2026-04-02 19:37 +0000
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Buzz McCool <buzz_mccool@yahoo.com> - 2026-04-02 11:34 -0700
      Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-02 12:13 -0700
        Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-03 07:44 +0000
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage someone <cffbf4deb9142bce48974efc0e64dede@example.com> - 2026-04-03 16:45 +0000
  Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2026-04-04 18:18 -0700
    Re: OT: Artemis II network TV coverage Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2026-04-05 07:40 +0000

csiph-web