Re: Rigol scope

Date	2025-08-15 19:49 -0400
Subject	Re: Rigol scope
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
References	<fe5n9ktjmb7kbd47ji9a5a1plv9bactqtn@4ax.com> <jieu9ktblvdfq5mhs96q96pn91jvkr20m9@4ax.com>
From	bitrex <user@example.net>
Message-ID	<689fc74b$0$5007$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/15/2025 9:54 AM, john larkin wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2025 12:33:57 -0700, john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B0CGHTLRHS/
>>
>> That's crazy. 4 channels at 12 bits and 250 MHz, built-in sig gen and
>> logic analyzer, $764 overnight with free shipping.
>>
>> I remember when a 30 MHz dual channel scope cost more than a
>> Chevrolet.
>>
>> The fad in test equipment is black this year. Ugly.
> 
> We got the scope. It has a built-in signal generator that will do AM
> or FM or PM sweeps. It has insane levels of signal processing and
> dozens of touch-screen menus.
> 
> It has HDMI so we put the display on our giant OLED on the wall.
> That's kind of cool.
> 
> I gave it to the kids so I can have my 500 MHz scope back. This one is
> way too complex for me. The manual is just a little piece of paper
> with a QR code that doesn't work.
> 

It's annoying when signal generators don't have external sync in but for 
the price mustn't grumble, I guess

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-12 12:33 -0700
  Re: Rigol scope Carl <carl.ijamesXX@YYverizon.net> - 2025-08-12 16:42 -0400
    Re: Rigol scope Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2025-08-12 21:22 +0000
    Re: Rigol scope liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-08-13 10:10 +0100
      Re: Rigol scope Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-13 10:14 +0000
        Re: Rigol scope liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-08-14 11:08 +0100
          Re: Rigol scope Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-14 11:24 +0000
          Re: Rigol scope "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-08-14 14:16 -0400
            Re: Rigol scope liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-08-14 21:15 +0100
          Re: Rigol scope Jan Panteltje <alien@comet.invalid> - 2025-08-15 06:28 +0000
            Re: Rigol scope liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) - 2025-08-15 10:39 +0100
  Re: Rigol scope Sergey Kubushyn <ksi@koi8.net> - 2025-08-12 21:14 +0000
    Re: Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-12 19:17 -0700
      Re: Rigol scope Klaus Kragelund <klauskvik@hotmail.com> - 2025-08-14 02:11 +0200
        Re: Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-13 19:47 -0700
          Re: Rigol scope Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2025-08-14 14:29 -0400
            Re: Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-14 12:27 -0700
              Re: Rigol scope Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2025-08-14 20:03 +0000
  Re: Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-15 06:54 -0700
    Re: Rigol scope Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2025-08-15 07:20 -0700
      Re: Rigol scope john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-15 08:24 -0700
        Re: Rigol scope Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2025-08-15 09:10 -0700
    Re: Rigol scope JM <sunaecoNoChoppedPork@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 22:57 +0100
    Re: Rigol scope bitrex <user@example.net> - 2025-08-15 19:49 -0400

csiph-web