Re: CTA5e termination alternatives

From	Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid>
Newsgroups	sci.electronics.design
Subject	Re: CTA5e termination alternatives
Date	2025-08-10 14:40 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<107b3kp$25i8r$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<1078cv7$1gnrt$1@dont-email.me> <107b1fl$24vlu$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On 8/10/2025 2:03 PM, Lasse Langwadt wrote:
> On 8/9/25 23:01, Don Y wrote:
>> I don't have the "volume budget" to accommodate RJ45/8P8C's.
> 
> what do you mean? that you don't have room for an RJ45?

Yes.  "Room" as in 3 dimensional space.  The devices are ~2.5 cubic inches;
an RJ45 is a sizable (relatively speaking) portion of that.

And, aside from initial installation, there is no need for a connector
(unless the device has to be replaced due to a failure) beyond making
the initial connection from cable end to device.

Back to sci.electronics.design | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

CTA5e termination alternatives Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:01 -0700
  Re: CTA5e termination alternatives Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-08-09 14:02 -0700
  Re: CTA5e termination alternatives Lasse Langwadt <llc@fonz.dk> - 2025-08-10 23:03 +0200
    Re: CTA5e termination alternatives Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> - 2025-08-10 14:40 -0700
      Re: CTA5e termination alternatives john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> - 2025-08-10 14:45 -0700

csiph-web