Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.components > #6494

Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.components
Subject Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55
Date Sun, 15 May 2022 18:42:24 +0200
Lines 11
Message-ID <jecorgFe9aqU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <m235hbb178.fsf@jschneider.tenreversed>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace individual.net 1w6yk+L+U3y+Dk+zj5YU/wZhQQhuxYZP8Zr47uEIfB/3A=
Cancel-Lock sha1:kHCqGxPiEz+VkPvmW+BEpcTvqH4=
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/68.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.12
In-Reply-To <m235hbb178.fsf@jschneider.tenreversed>
Xref csiph.com sci.electronics.components:6494

Show key headers only | View raw


Jon Schneider schrieb:
> What is the difference between BZX79 and BZX55 (and other) series Zener
> diodes ?

Wild guess: Just the manufacturer who wants to avoid that customers
having tested and thereafter implemented diodes out of his series
could switch without problems to same named types fom manufacturer B?

Bye

Reinhard

Back to sci.electronics.components | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

BZX79 vs. BZX55 Jon Schneider <jon@jschneider.tenreversed> - 2022-05-15 10:21 +0100
  Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55 Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2022-05-15 18:42 +0200
  Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55 John Robertson <spam@flippers.com> - 2022-05-15 13:07 -0700
    Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55 Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2022-05-16 00:08 +0200
  Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55 legg <legg@nospam.magma.ca> - 2022-05-16 09:36 -0400
    Re: BZX79 vs. BZX55 Reinhard Zwirner <reinhard.zwirner@t-online.de> - 2022-05-16 22:36 +0200

csiph-web