Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.electronics.basics > #54732

Re: Testing small Transformer questions

From Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.basics
Subject Re: Testing small Transformer questions
Date 2023-02-25 14:00 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <slrntvk55r.9h0.dan@djph.net> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <4047c7f0-5227-49c7-9937-9c9dc28589aen@googlegroups.com> <slrntvekc9.9h0.dan@djph.net> <7b83d455-4f12-4258-9dfd-b9e21d12d362n@googlegroups.com> <slrntvftfn.9h0.dan@djph.net> <bc87f2ca-805b-42dc-91ea-f410910b6656n@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 2023-02-25, StevWolf wrote:
> On Thursday, February 23, 2023 at 6:26:45 PM UTC-5, Dan Purgert wrote:
>> On 2023-02-23, StevWolf wrote: 
>>> [...]
>> > 100 ohm Resistor on continuity is .145 oddly
>> Okay, and it shows 100 (+/- 10%) on the Resistance scale?
>> > .39 ohm Resistor on 200 scale is 7.6 again oddly
>> What's the banding on this resistor? Also; have you checked the leads 
>> themselves?
>> > Model of meter is MTP model 2322
>> I can't find a single thing about this online. Must be old?
>> [...]
>> No, there are datasheets... but old stuff might not have them (or 
>> they're limited to china markets ) 
>
> Yes the 100 ohm resistor  shows 100 ohms on the 200 scale.

Perfect.  Sounds like the continuity scale is off by a considerable
amount then.

>
> The .39 ohm resistor is a 2 watt  orange, white, silver, gold.

Perfect.  That might simply be too low if the LOWEST range your meter
does is 200 ohms. You'd likely want a 20 or 2 ohm range.

>
> The leads are in good condition. 

More that they can impart resistance / capacitance / etc into a circuit;
also selection of the terminals on the meter can matter.

>
> Actually I have found several links for this meter. Here is one.
>
> https://www.directindustry.com/prod/mtp-instruments-inc/product-131921-1932654.html

Yeah, I found that too; but no real information to be had.  They only
have a defunct link to the manufacturer's website for more details.

>
> Well as far as data sheets for transformers I find for me anyway,  I
> do not find them as easy to find as common as other small parts, I
> mean you can find a data sheet on almost any old transistor, triac
> diac or component etc. But l find transformers less available. And if
> Chinese transformers are less likely then we are really out of luck as
> almost everything is made there. 

There's a difference between "made for chinese markets" (such as what
one finds inside a cheapo USB hub / power supply / etc), and "made for
export markets" (such as what one finds everywhere).


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=hLbB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
|_|O|_|
|_|_|O| Github: https://github.com/dpurgert
|O|O|O| PGP: DDAB 23FB 19FA 7D85 1CC1  E067 6D65 70E5 4CE7 2860

Back to sci.electronics.basics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Testing small Transformer questions StevWolf <colinmarr0@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 05:52 -0800
  Re: Testing small Transformer questions Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-02-22 15:32 +0000
    Re: Testing small Transformer questions StevWolf <colinmarr0@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 09:42 -0800
      Re: Testing small Transformer questions Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-02-23 11:43 +0000
        Re: Testing small Transformer questions StevWolf <colinmarr0@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 10:00 -0800
          Re: Testing small Transformer questions Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-02-23 23:24 +0000
            Re: Testing small Transformer questions StevWolf <colinmarr0@gmail.com> - 2023-02-24 18:11 -0800
              Re: Testing small Transformer questions Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-02-25 14:00 +0000
              Re: Testing small Transformer questions Lamont Cranston <amdx62@gmail.com> - 2023-04-29 18:00 -0700

csiph-web