Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > rec.games.computer.doom.misc > #8

Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95

From cr0c0d1le <cr0c0d1le.ewlkg@8shield.net>
Newsgroups rec.games.computer.doom.misc
Subject Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95
Date 2024-01-04 08:31 -0500
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87edexdy38.fsf@neptune> (permalink)
References <uls7rb$2goh$1@dont-email.me> <1810a03db65bd6623c716461e204d057@m75q.vera-visions.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Marco Cawthorne <marco@vera-visions.com> writes:

> H1M3M wrote:
>> Also, it never felt as smooth as the Dos version, but... Sigh. It was
> the only version available to me at the time.
>
> I heard there's still people swearing by Doom95.
> Wonder if any of them are on here...
What's so great about Doom95?

Back to rec.games.computer.doom.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 plateshutoverlock <blinkingblythe01@gmail.com> - 2022-03-16 11:41 -0700
  Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 H1M3M <wipnoah@gmail.com> - 2023-12-19 15:03 +0100
    Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 Marco Cawthorne <marco@vera-visions.com> - 2023-12-20 00:09 -0800
      Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 H1M3M <wipnoah@gmail.com> - 2023-12-20 09:58 +0100
        Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2023-12-21 07:31 +0000
          Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2023-12-21 23:01 +0000
      Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 cr0c0d1le <cr0c0d1le.ewlkg@8shield.net> - 2024-01-04 08:31 -0500
        Re: need doom, doom2, or doom 95 ant@zimage.comANT (Ant) - 2024-01-04 19:01 +0000

csiph-web