Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > rec.games.chess.misc > #44917
| From | "Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | rec.games.chess.misc |
| Subject | Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. |
| Date | 2025-07-26 18:47 -0500 |
| Organization | Hasbro |
| Message-ID | <mel7nvFb9a9U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <meio6jFt2ipU1@mid.individual.net> <1063ap1$2i2vb$1@dont-email.me> |
William Hyde wrote: > Lane "Stonehowler" Waldby wrote: >> Just kidding. However, I did make a first step. >> >> I've been working on a comprehensive checklist for each turn like that >> 2300 GM I was playing must have had. >> >> 1. Gauge threats. > > Tactics are fundamental, yes. Is your opponent threatening anything? > Did his move create an opportunity for you? > > Chess, Teichmann said, is 99% tactics. You will improve most rapidly if > you study tactics, but too many players instead study opening theory, > only to find themselves lost as soon as they exit their memorized > variations. > > Playing over master games will by itself give you a feel for openings. > Not much time should be spent on positional play until you stop dropping > pieces to short combinations. And you'll get a feel for it anyway, > playing over games. > >> >> Look where the queen can play if still on the board. Look what's >> developed, any open diagonals of bishops, etc. > > > That's a bit random. No it's not. I was still talking about gauging threats. Look where the enemy queen can play. Look what developed enemy pieces can do. Look at any open diagonals of enemy bishops, etc. This is the way you can gauge immediate threats in the next turn. It doesn't cover knights two moves away though. You obviously thought I was talking about my queen, my developed pieces and my bishops. -- Hasbro
Back to rec.games.chess.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Okay, I've got it all figured out now. "Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-07-25 20:09 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 15:36 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. "Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-07-26 18:47 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-08-12 18:42 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 17:45 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-07-27 13:51 -0700
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-27 17:35 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. The Horny Goat <lcraver@home.ca> - 2025-07-30 22:50 -0700
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-07-31 18:53 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. "Blueshirt" <blueshirt@indigo.news> - 2025-08-01 13:24 +0100
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-01 15:51 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-08-12 22:01 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 17:50 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-08-12 22:08 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-13 17:52 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-08-13 22:26 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-14 17:15 -0400
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. Lane the Caustic <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> - 2025-08-14 19:49 -0500
Re: Okay, I've got it all figured out now. William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> - 2025-08-15 15:23 -0400
csiph-web