Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > openwatcom.users.c_cpp > #3675

Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++

From cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross)
Newsgroups alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp, comp.lang.c
Subject Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++
Date 2025-11-07 16:54 +0000
Organization PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID <10el88k$hqi$2@reader2.panix.com> (permalink)
References <hhq63802k7f@news7.newsguy.com> <10eda8d$3pd45$1@dont-email.me> <10el4gt$2cb$1@reader2.panix.com> <qQoPQ.1134549$p8E9.400952@fx18.iad>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

In article <qQoPQ.1134549$p8E9.400952@fx18.iad>,
Scott Lurndal <slp53@pacbell.net> wrote:
>cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
>>In article <10eda8d$3pd45$1@dont-email.me>,
>>Peter Flass  <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> wrote:
>>>On 11/4/25 08:20, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>>> Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes:
>>>>> On 2025-11-03, Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/3/25 13:24, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> When I saw this subject line, I thought it was some necroposting to
>>>>> threads from 1990.
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone still cared about segmented x86 shit in 2010 (even if 32 bit)?
>>>> 
>>>> There are still people on the internet who swear that the 286 is
>>>> better than sliced bread and refuse to recognize that modern
>>>> architectures are superior.
>>>> 
>>>
>>>I was thinking, are there any segmented architectures today? Most 
>>>disguise segmentation as a flat address space (e.g. IBM System/370 et.seq.)
>>
>>x86_64 is still nominally segmented; what "code segment" the
>>processor is running in matters, even in long mode.  But most of
>>the segment data is ignored by hardware (e.g., base and limits)
>>in 64-bit mode.
>
>Minor correction,  an update to AMD64 was done back in
>the oughts to support some segment limit registers for 64-bit XEN
>(and probably for vmware as well).
>
>See the LMSLE bit in the EFER register for more details.

Interesting.  AMD-only, not Intel.

This is why we can't have nice things.

	- Dan C.

Back to openwatcom.users.c_cpp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-02 13:20 -0700
  OT: 2010 posts (was: Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++) Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2025-11-03 14:58 +0000
  Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> - 2025-11-03 14:24 -0600
    Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-03 16:25 -0700
      Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-04 00:26 +0000
        Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-04 15:20 +0000
          Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-04 09:39 -0700
            Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-04 17:14 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-04 17:32 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-04 17:38 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-11-04 21:23 +0100
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-04 22:04 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-11-05 08:50 +0100
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-05 15:15 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-11-06 08:51 +0100
            Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 22:17 +0000
            Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-11-07 15:50 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-07 16:08 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-11-07 16:54 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-07 08:22 -0800
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-11-07 17:22 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-09 11:15 +0200
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-11-10 09:08 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-11-07 17:43 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-07 19:40 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-08 08:45 -0700
          Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-11-04 17:12 +0000
            Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-11-04 12:15 -0500
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-11-04 17:21 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-11-04 22:19 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-11-05 00:13 +0000
              Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-11-07 16:46 +0000
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-08 08:47 -0700
                Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-11-08 21:17 +0000
        Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-04 08:29 -0800
    Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2025-11-04 08:32 -0800

csiph-web