Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > openwatcom.users.c_cpp > #3646
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.sys.pdp10, alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ |
| Date | Sun, 2 Nov 2025 13:08:25 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 17 |
| Message-ID | <10e8dnp$2bc04$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <hhq63802k7f@news7.newsguy.com> <hk19uh$t7r$2@news.eternal-september.org> <dutd37xkbe.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au> <hka3q6$bhl$1@USTR-NEWS.TR.UNISYS.COM> <a75n37-b4a.ln1@laptop.reistad.name> <hkba74$355$1@naig.caltech.edu> <IU.D20100322.T095617.P22846.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> <80otshFelcU2@mid.individual.net> <4ba90730.29070015@news.xs4all.nl> <hob9tl$dq7$1@naig.caltech.edu> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 02 Nov 2025 20:08:26 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="fc529217a4baebb46ed219cf099a002c"; logging-data="2469892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19YZ0gA2o/j3oR6QyuxyfD/" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:we5Np2tGIlM4vBqsTO4fQgW3Vag= |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <hob9tl$dq7$1@naig.caltech.edu> |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.sys.pdp10:9778 alt.folklore.computers:232026 openwatcom.users.c_cpp:3646 comp.lang.c:395045 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 3/23/10 13:56, glen herrmannsfeldt wrote: > In alt.sys.pdp10 Richard Bos <raltbos@xs4all.nl> wrote: > (snip) > >> That crossposting was, for once, not asinine. It served as a nice >> example why, even now, Leenux weenies are not correct when they insist >> that C has a flat memory model and all pointers are just numbers. > This is true often enough to be dangerous when it turns out not to be. > Well, you could also read the C standard to learn that. > > There are additional complications for C on the PDP-10. > > -- glen
Back to openwatcom.users.c_cpp | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-02 13:08 -0700
csiph-web