Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > openwatcom.users.c_cpp > #3645
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> |
| Newsgroups | alt.sys.pdp10, alt.folklore.computers, openwatcom.users.c_cpp, comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ |
| Date | Sun, 2 Nov 2025 12:57:51 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <10e8d3v$2bc04$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <hhq63802k7f@news7.newsguy.com> <hk19uh$t7r$2@news.eternal-september.org> <dutd37xkbe.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au> <hka3q6$bhl$1@USTR-NEWS.TR.UNISYS.COM> <a75n37-b4a.ln1@laptop.reistad.name> <hkba74$355$1@naig.caltech.edu> <IU.D20100322.T095617.P22846.Q0@J.de.Boyne.Pollard.localhost> <80otshFelcU2@mid.individual.net> <4ba90730.29070015@news.xs4all.nl> <hob9tl$dq7$1@naig.caltech.edu> <1e27d5ee-a1b1-45d9-9188-63ab37398e9f@d37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <MPG.26137db0f4722b3d9896da@news.eternal-september.org> <87k4t1thk5.fsf@kilospaz.fatphil.org> <f51c9aec-550b-4720-97e0-8fa743524f59@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Sun, 02 Nov 2025 19:57:52 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="fc529217a4baebb46ed219cf099a002c"; logging-data="2469892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qOyEBDCriS0+O1M2aTNVu" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla Thunderbird |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:DGjv6FU47vr4WpLNUn1rqp3gEKk= |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| In-Reply-To | <f51c9aec-550b-4720-97e0-8fa743524f59@b30g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| Xref | csiph.com alt.sys.pdp10:9777 alt.folklore.computers:232025 openwatcom.users.c_cpp:3645 comp.lang.c:395044 |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
On 3/25/10 03:02, Nick Keighley wrote: > On 24 Mar, 23:40, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@yahoo.co.uk> > wrote: >> Dann Corbit <dcor...@connx.com> writes: >>> In article <1e27d5ee-a1b1-45d9-9188- >>> 63ab37398...@d37g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, >>> nick_keighley_nos...@hotmail.com says... >> >>>> On 23 Mar, 20:56, glen herrmannsfeldt <g...@ugcs.caltech.edu> wrote: >>>>> In alt.sys.pdp10 Richard Bos <ralt...@xs4all.nl> wrote: >>>>> (snip) >> >>>>>> That crossposting was, for once, not asinine. It served as a nice >>>>>> example why, even now, Leenux weenies are not correct when they insist >>>>>> that C has a flat memory model and all pointers are just numbers. >> >>>>> Well, you could also read the C standard to learn that. >> >>>> but if you say that you get accused of language lawyering. >>>> "Since IBM stopped making 360s no C program ever needs to run on such >>>> a platform" >> >>> We have customers who are running their business on harware from the mid >>> 1980s. It may sound ludicrous, but it if solves all of their business >>> needs, and runs solid 24x365, why should they upgrade? >> >> Because they could run an equivalently computationally powerful >> solution with various levels of redundancy and fail-over protection, >> with a power budget sensibly measured in mere Watts? > > does it have a Coral compiler? There's a market for someone.
Back to openwatcom.users.c_cpp | Previous | Next | Find similar
Re: 16:32 far pointers in OpenWatcom C/C++ Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-02 12:57 -0700
csiph-web