Re: Preferences please - which assembler for OS/2 ?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.os2.programmer.misc, openwatcom.users.c_cpp
Subject	Re: Preferences please - which assembler for OS/2 ?
Date	Sun, 2 Nov 2025 12:49:54 -0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Lines	12
Message-ID	<10e8cl2$2bc04$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<1012itfeaq8tlf5@corp.supernews.com> <4011653F.68C220A5@Tesco.NET>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
Injection-Date	Sun, 02 Nov 2025 19:49:55 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="fc529217a4baebb46ed219cf099a002c"; logging-data="2469892"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rxfryB6Sz5C+uAZj2LOvW"
User-Agent	Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock	sha1:8nSuYnCKbxjQZ9ZBSx0/GE+Se18=
In-Reply-To	<4011653F.68C220A5@Tesco.NET>
Content-Language	en-US
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.os2.programmer.misc:1938 openwatcom.users.c_cpp:3643

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 1/23/04 11:17, Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> JHL> The means to get to actual object code will be one of the
> JHL> existing assemblers, but I'm sounding out the people here
> JHL> about preferences among assemblers, and the reasons for
> JHL> their choices.  [...]
> JHL> Among the candidates are I.B.M.'s ALP, MS MASM v. 6.11 for
> JHL> OS/2, TASM v. 4.1 for OS/2, NASM, GAS, .... any others ?
> 
> WASM.

JWASM, which is a fork of WASM. I needed cross-platform, and as I recall 
NASM had some problem, maybe ORG?

Back to openwatcom.users.c_cpp | Previous | Next | Find similar

Thread

Re: Preferences please - which assembler for OS/2 ? Peter Flass <Peter@Iron-Spring.com> - 2025-11-02 12:49 -0700

csiph-web