Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > microsoft.public.windowsxp.general > #143828
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.photography, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, alt.comp.os.windows-10 |
| Subject | Re: How to waste the least space with browser tabs? |
| Date | 2017-05-15 10:39 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <ofcedq$4ab$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <72uihclnnn1p5vr9h0tisef5l4n4o1hh43@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 5/15/2017 6:00 AM, Micky wrote: > How to waste the least space with browser tabs? > > 1) When starting a new tab, which uses less RAM: to enter the new > url in a current tab and move forward to it from the current url. OR > to close the current tab and open a new empty one??? > > I would think the second is the better one, except maybe there is > overhead in opening a new tab, and maybe closing the old tab leaves > some space unreleased that corresponds to some of that overhead. Thus > gettering and extra chunk of overhead for every tab closed. I haven't measured anything, but I would expect closing the tab and opening a new one would use less memory... IF there is any difference at all. I believe the issue is retention of previous page information which doesn't really change between the two cases. You don't say which browser you are using, but the ones I use retain all manner of info on visited pages including a complete image. At least that is what I've read when browser memory usage is explained. I can't understand why a browser uses GB of memory except for that sort of memory use. > I know that closing tabs in itself is not enough to put the RAM > situation back the way it was. If I open too many tabs, and the > browser starts to slow, I can release 5 tabs or more, until only one > tab shows, and the browser will still be slow and about to freeze. I think you can tell the browser to not retain all that info, but don't ask me how to do it. Also this depends on the browser. > This might well vary from browser to browser, so I'm curious about > them all but most interested in Firefox and SeaMonkey. (Firefox has > several features SM doesn't have, but every 5 minutes there was a > script problem, and as few as 5 tabs could make it freeze in XP. SM > is much better about that. I have all but quit using Firefox because it runs so slow. I use Windows and am primarily using Opera and some Chrome these days. Opera seems to be the most well behaved browser I have seen, but every once in a while a page won't work correctly with it. I tried looking at a supermarket sale page and had to use Chrome. But that is *very* infrequent. > 2) Also, I have the impression that maps and satellite views take a > lot of RAM, because they have a value for every*** pixel on the > screen, plus if one has moved left, right, up, down all that data even > though it's not in view is in RAM also (it might be in Virtual Stoage, > but thrashing is another problem. So if I think I've opened too > many tabs and I should try to free up space, am I right that google > maps and sat. view are a much better place to start than an all text > page or one with a few graphics??? Every page has a full bit mapped image generated in RAM, so that isn't an issue. But it does have to uncompress the image files (jpg or whatever) to bit map. That uses CPU time. You may be facing a memory shortage. I run with 16 GB, but I also have bunches of tabs always open. -- Rick C
Back to microsoft.public.windowsxp.general | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
How to waste the least space with browser tabs? Micky <misc07@bigfoot.com> - 2017-05-15 13:00 +0300 Re: How to waste the least space with browser tabs? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-05-15 09:18 -0400 Re: How to waste the least space with browser tabs? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2017-05-15 10:39 -0400 Re: How to waste the least space with browser tabs? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-05-15 11:12 -0400
csiph-web