Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming > #31271
| X-Received | by 10.66.190.7 with SMTP id gm7mr28117854pac.23.1439349211558; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:13:31 -0700 (PDT) |
|---|---|
| X-Received | by 10.140.105.102 with SMTP id b93mr291936qgf.26.1439349211261; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:13:31 -0700 (PDT) |
| Path | csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!pg9no8865113igb.0!news-out.google.com!78ni9297qge.1!nntp.google.com!69no5137325qgl.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail |
| Newsgroups | microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming |
| Date | Tue, 11 Aug 2015 20:13:30 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <a6978bfd-b275-468c-9c7d-a4a64b2e9f4a@googlegroups.com> |
| Complaints-To | groups-abuse@google.com |
| Injection-Info | glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.61.135.70; posting-account=SOVadwoAAAB3h7W1MLW9kMYtEc2JW2L8 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 173.61.135.70 |
| References | <mqbsbp$9va$1@dont-email.me> <a6978bfd-b275-468c-9c7d-a4a64b2e9f4a@googlegroups.com> |
| User-Agent | G2/1.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Message-ID | <cb58131a-eab8-48e9-b21d-f27cb8ede03a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID |
| From | rpresser <rpresser@gmail.com> |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 12 Aug 2015 03:13:31 +0000 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
| Xref | csiph.com microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming:31271 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 6:30:24 PM UTC-4, --CELKO-- wrote: > In SQL, we would have UNIQUE (a, b) and CHECK (a < b) instead. Addressing this and only this point you've made, and not addressing flaws in the original poster's model (which you have already done): There is no guarantee that the left side GUID actually is less than the right side; your check constraint would very likely prevent adding references to the join table.
Back to microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID Michael Cole <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-11 14:07 +1000
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2015-08-11 21:35 +0200
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID rpresser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 12:46 -0700
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID --CELKO-- <jcelko212@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-11 15:30 -0700
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID rpresser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2015-08-11 20:13 -0700
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID --CELKO-- <jcelko212@earthlink.net> - 2015-08-12 18:26 -0700
Re: Unique Constraint Based on Dual GUID Michael Cole <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-13 11:59 +1000
csiph-web