Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.gentoo.dev > #70436
| From | Andrey Grozin <grozin@gentoo.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.gentoo.dev |
| Subject | Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS |
| Date | 2026-04-22 06:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MMwUN-h2bQ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MLwat-glgE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MLD2h-gq2c-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <MLDlD-gq8E-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Sun, 19 Apr 2026, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2026 at 05:13:26PM +0100, Sam James wrote: >> Andrey Grozin <grozin@gentoo.org> writes: >>> It seems qtbase in Gentoo (and arch) is compiled in a way that makes >>> it incompatible with binary programs compiled for other distros. >> Qt upstream recommends we use this and I think they plan to make it the >> default for Qt 7. It improves load time. > Actually kind of surprised this is the first time I hear of this > considering we made the switch without rebuilding everything, > meaning packages built against regular Qt started using it without > a rebuild and didn't complain? Or am I missing something? > > Think there are other prebuilts using it too, like google-chrome's > qt6 plugin (is it broken?). > > Maybe it's something specifically with how this was built like > maybe it used a old binutils or something similar, not that we > can do much about it either way. I can try to contact the upstream and ask them to recompile this program. But I need more information for preparing such a letter: 1. What exactly is different in the way we compile qtbase and, say, Ubuntu? (they definitely support Ubuntu) 2. What exactly have they to do to recompile their (secret) sources to be compatible with our Qt6? Does this require introducing some changes to the sources, or is just recompiling with some changed flag(s) sufficient? 3. In the case they recompile, will the new binary remain compatible with Ubuntu, Debian, RHEL? Or will 2 different binaries be necessary? Andrey
Back to linux.gentoo.dev | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Andrey Grozin <grozin@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-19 11:00 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-19 18:20 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-19 18:40 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-19 18:50 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Andrey Grozin <grozin@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-22 06:00 +0200
Re: [gentoo-dev] Qt question: GNU_PROPERTY_1_NEEDED_INDIRECT_EXTERN_ACCESS Ionen Wolkens <ionen@gentoo.org> - 2026-04-22 07:00 +0200
csiph-web