Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > linux.debian.vote > #5701

Re: Questions for Sruthi

From Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.vote
Subject Re: Questions for Sruthi
Date 2026-04-03 22:00 +0200
Message-ID <MFSQp-csJQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <MAiue-8FL1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <MCdTr-9ZwF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MCoc9-a6Bi-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On 25/03/26 05:31, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Sruthi Chandran dijo [Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:36:04PM +0100]:
>> As far as I am aware, the two main things Debian as project does for 
>> diversity are Outreachy internships and special Diversity budget for 
>> DebConfs. I am not sure both of this are working. To know if these 
>> are working, there should be a study of retention ratio of 
>> contributors benefiting from these initiatives. This is one of the 
>> things I want to start with. We might have to completely restructure 
>> our efforts based on the output.
>
> Please count me in for this! I would be quite interested in sitting
> together with you (even with the diameter of our planet between us) 
> and try
> to crunch data on how many people have come via Outreachy internships and
> Diversity budgets and stayed to become a regular contributor, how many
> might have not joined Debian but perhaps some related free software
> project, and how many might have dropped from our sight. I think this can
> be point to important data to judge whether our efforts are worth it, and
> how to best tune them for improvement.
Thanks Gunnar, I will contact you first when taking up this task.
>
>> By becoming a DPL, one thing I can certainly do is become an example 
>> for others.
>
> Yes, and I must say, it's one of the things that I am most happy about of
> having you as our next DPL.
Thanks :)
>
>>> Question 2:
>>>
>>> If you could snap your fingers and bypass a GR and instantly change 
>>> anything in our constitution, what would that be?
>>
>> The thing I most love about Debian is its Democratic structure and 
>> collective decision making (even with its numerous shortcomings). The 
>> fact that DPL's decision itself can be overridden by GR is something 
>> that makes Debian different from other distros. So, I do not want to 
>> do any change to the constitution by bypassing GR, but I might want 
>> to propose a GR instead.
>>
>> "Defining a simpler decision making process than GR for simpler 
>> problems". My idea is that we can have GR as usual, but also 
>> something simpler to make decisions on day to day activities when we 
>> do not reach consensus through mailing list discussions.
>
> I have often said that we should not fear GRs — we should try to make 
> them
> manageable. Having a GR on any given topic should not be seen as 
> stressful
> as it is seen, and should not prompt dozens of news sites to look 
> greedily
> at Debian knowing a large flamefest is coming. In my opinion, a GR should
> be usable even to gauge the project's opinion on any given topic, without
> making it necessary for it to be a huge discussion.
>
> Of course, neither our culture nor our processes nor our tools help 
> us. GRs
> are heavy, they have long defined discussion and voting periods (even if
> they are more manageable since 
> https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 )
>
Yes, using GRs on daily basis would be like using sledgehammer to kill a 
fly.

> Do you have any improvements to this process that could help making
> mini-GRs more manageable?

I like the name mini-GRs :)

I just have some ideas, nothing concrete. Mini-GRs can be within a team 
or if it concerns the whole project, among all the DDs. Instead of long 
weeks of GR discussions, we can focus on reaching decision within a week 
or two of discussion. We can also reduce the requirement for sponsorship 
for the proposals. If our current voting system is heavy, we can even 
think of something lighter.

>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
>
>  — Gunnar.

Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Questions for Sruthi Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2026-03-19 11:10 +0100
  Re: Questions for Sruthi Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-03-24 18:40 +0100
    Re: Questions for Sruthi Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-03-25 05:40 +0100
      Re: Questions for Sruthi Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-03-28 23:30 +0100
        Re: Questions for Sruthi "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org> - 2026-03-29 12:10 +0200
      Re: Questions for Sruthi Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-03 22:00 +0200
        Re: Questions for Sruthi Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-04-04 01:00 +0200
          Re: Questions for Sruthi Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 05:00 +0200
          Re: Questions for Sruthi Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 12:50 +0200
            Re: Questions for Sruthi Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-04-05 13:10 +0200

csiph-web