Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #5701
| From | Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: Questions for Sruthi |
| Date | 2026-04-03 22:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MFSQp-csJQ-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MAiue-8FL1-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <MCdTr-9ZwF-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MCoc9-a6Bi-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 25/03/26 05:31, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Sruthi Chandran dijo [Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 06:36:04PM +0100]: >> As far as I am aware, the two main things Debian as project does for >> diversity are Outreachy internships and special Diversity budget for >> DebConfs. I am not sure both of this are working. To know if these >> are working, there should be a study of retention ratio of >> contributors benefiting from these initiatives. This is one of the >> things I want to start with. We might have to completely restructure >> our efforts based on the output. > > Please count me in for this! I would be quite interested in sitting > together with you (even with the diameter of our planet between us) > and try > to crunch data on how many people have come via Outreachy internships and > Diversity budgets and stayed to become a regular contributor, how many > might have not joined Debian but perhaps some related free software > project, and how many might have dropped from our sight. I think this can > be point to important data to judge whether our efforts are worth it, and > how to best tune them for improvement. Thanks Gunnar, I will contact you first when taking up this task. > >> By becoming a DPL, one thing I can certainly do is become an example >> for others. > > Yes, and I must say, it's one of the things that I am most happy about of > having you as our next DPL. Thanks :) > >>> Question 2: >>> >>> If you could snap your fingers and bypass a GR and instantly change >>> anything in our constitution, what would that be? >> >> The thing I most love about Debian is its Democratic structure and >> collective decision making (even with its numerous shortcomings). The >> fact that DPL's decision itself can be overridden by GR is something >> that makes Debian different from other distros. So, I do not want to >> do any change to the constitution by bypassing GR, but I might want >> to propose a GR instead. >> >> "Defining a simpler decision making process than GR for simpler >> problems". My idea is that we can have GR as usual, but also >> something simpler to make decisions on day to day activities when we >> do not reach consensus through mailing list discussions. > > I have often said that we should not fear GRs — we should try to make > them > manageable. Having a GR on any given topic should not be seen as > stressful > as it is seen, and should not prompt dozens of news sites to look > greedily > at Debian knowing a large flamefest is coming. In my opinion, a GR should > be usable even to gauge the project's opinion on any given topic, without > making it necessary for it to be a huge discussion. > > Of course, neither our culture nor our processes nor our tools help > us. GRs > are heavy, they have long defined discussion and voting periods (even if > they are more manageable since > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 ) > Yes, using GRs on daily basis would be like using sledgehammer to kill a fly. > Do you have any improvements to this process that could help making > mini-GRs more manageable? I like the name mini-GRs :) I just have some ideas, nothing concrete. Mini-GRs can be within a team or if it concerns the whole project, among all the DDs. Instead of long weeks of GR discussions, we can focus on reaching decision within a week or two of discussion. We can also reduce the requirement for sponsorship for the proposals. If our current voting system is heavy, we can even think of something lighter. > > Thanks for your answers! > > > — Gunnar.
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Questions for Sruthi Jonathan Carter <jcc@debian.org> - 2026-03-19 11:10 +0100
Re: Questions for Sruthi Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-03-24 18:40 +0100
Re: Questions for Sruthi Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-03-25 05:40 +0100
Re: Questions for Sruthi Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-03-28 23:30 +0100
Re: Questions for Sruthi "Jonathan Dowland" <jmtd@debian.org> - 2026-03-29 12:10 +0200
Re: Questions for Sruthi Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-04-03 22:00 +0200
Re: Questions for Sruthi Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2026-04-04 01:00 +0200
Re: Questions for Sruthi Don Armstrong <don@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 05:00 +0200
Re: Questions for Sruthi Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> - 2026-04-05 12:50 +0200
Re: Questions for Sruthi Marc Haber <mh+debian-vote@zugschlus.de> - 2026-04-05 13:10 +0200
csiph-web