Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.vote > #5641
| From | Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.vote |
| Subject | Re: Q: communication and discussions with developers |
| Date | 2026-03-21 17:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MB7n3-9eka-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MA6W5-8xDt-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 18/03/26 22:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi Sruthi, > > Debian Constitution paragraph 5.1.9 says the following about the project leader: > >> 9. Lead discussions amongst Developers. >> >> The Project Leader should attempt to participate in discussions >> amongst the Developers in a helpful way which seeks to bring the >> discussion to bear on the key issues at hand. The Project Leader >> should not use the Leadership position to promote their own personal >> views. > In practice, I don't think that we rely that much on the DPL's ability > to organize discussions. But it has certainly be helpful for several > DPLs to use mailing list discussions to test and refine ideas. And there > are many developers who contribute to those discussions. > > But you have not been very active in mailing list discussions, so I'm > wondering: Yes, I was not very active on mailing lists. Let me be very honest here, I did not want to fuel or be part of flame wars wherever possible. Most of the time, by the time I read the complete thread, what I wanted to say would have be said already by someone else and I did not want to participate just for the sake of it. I have participated in instances where I felt very strongly about something and I had entirely different things to say than already discussed. But as a DPL, I would be following the discussions more closely wherever possible and respond more often. > 1/ As DPL, do you plan to help "seek to bring the discussions to bear on > the key issues at hand"? Yes, definitely I would be facilitating discussions to find solutions for the issues at hand. I am a good listener and I plan to listen to all the stakeholders involved. I would try to make these discussions as productive as possible by minimizing misunderstanding by being a catalyst. > > 2/ And probably more importantly, what communication means do you plan to > use to test and refine your own ideas? While we all know, mails are our primary means of communication, but mails does lead to a lot of misunderstandings and result in unnecessary flame wars. Depending on how volatile the situation is, I would try to have some online meetings of the stakeholders wherever possible. I think short online meetings would be far productive than spending hours on flame wars on mailing lists with no result. But I do know this is not feasible always, sometimes we would have to have input from the larger community and then, we would have to rely on mailing lists. Even then, I would try to my best to minimize the misunderstandings. > > Lucas >
Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Q: communication and discussions with developers Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2026-03-18 22:50 +0100
Re: Q: communication and discussions with developers Sruthi Chandran <srud@disroot.org> - 2026-03-21 17:30 +0100
Re: Q: communication and discussions with developers Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2026-03-23 09:30 +0100
csiph-web