Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.vote > #4593

Re: Security review of tag2upload

From Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.vote
Subject Re: Security review of tag2upload
Date 2024-06-17 07:50 +0200
Message-ID <IQdpE-3vuD-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <IOl7X-2gWq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IQ0LL-3nwF-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <IQ1eN-3nH6-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <IQ1y9-3o3P-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <IQ2Nz-3oLP-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On 2024-06-16 2 h 23 p.m., Russ Allbery wrote:
> 
> For the existing source package signatures, a simplified sequence looks
> like this:
> 
>      human --> (1) dpkg-buildpackage --> (2) debsign --> (3) archive
> 
> For tag2upload, a simplified sequence looks like:
> 
>      human --> (1) Git --> (2) tag2upload --> (3) debsign --> (4) archive

Please excuse my naiveté, but how do you actually know that your package 
"works" with the tag2upload workflow if you're not building anything 
locally before pushing?

By "works", I mean, how have you tested it will build and will pass all 
the proper pre-upload tests?

On my side, I tend to work on a Git tree and when I'm happy with it I 
use sbuild to:

1. build the source and the binary packages (and thus run build tests)
2. run Lintian
3. run autopkgtests

Only if all of these steps seem OK will I consider signing and uploading 
the resulting source package (and yes, in reality what I actually intend 
to sign is the Git tree I worked on).

Implementation notwithstanding, I'd be more than happy to have a "git 
$something" replace my use of debsign and dput, but I am genuinely 
curious to know why we would make it easier to upload something that 
hasn't passed what I believe are important QA steps before uploading?

Andreas Tille already raised that point in another thread, but the 
answer seems to have been that it's already possible. Incentivising such 
a behavior doesn't sound positive to me.

-- 
   ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
   ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
   ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
   ⠈⠳⣄

Back to linux.debian.vote | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 03:40 +0200
  Re: Security review of tag2upload Antoine Beaupré <anarcat@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 19:20 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 20:00 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 21:50 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 20:30 +0200
  Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-06-13 16:00 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon Richter <sjr@debian.org> - 2024-06-13 16:10 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-06-13 17:00 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2024-06-13 18:40 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-13 20:00 +0200
        Re: Security review of tag2upload Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-06-13 23:00 +0200
          Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 18:40 +0200
            Re: Security review of tag2upload Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 23:30 +0200
              Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-24 20:30 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-13 21:00 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload [transfer.fsckObjects] Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-06-14 00:00 +0200
        Re: Security review of tag2upload [transfer.fsckObjects] Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-14 00:50 +0200
          Re: Security review of tag2upload [transfer.fsckObjects] Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-14 01:00 +0200
  Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-16 05:10 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 08:50 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 09:00 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-16 12:50 +0200
        Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 18:10 +0200
          Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-16 18:20 +0200
            Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 18:50 +0200
              Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-16 19:10 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 20:30 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-16 21:20 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2024-06-16 22:00 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 22:10 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-17 06:40 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 07:30 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2024-06-17 07:50 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 07:50 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 08:20 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2024-06-17 08:20 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2024-06-17 09:40 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 17:40 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Aigars Mahinovs <aigarius@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 12:50 +0200
              Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-06-17 11:00 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 12:40 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2024-06-17 13:30 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2024-06-17 13:30 +0200
                Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-17 17:30 +0200
              Re: Security review of tag2upload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-06-17 13:40 +0200
            Re: Security review of tag2upload Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-06-16 19:30 +0200
          Re: Security review of tag2upload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-06-17 13:30 +0200
  Re: Security review of tag2upload HW42 <hw42@ipsumj.de> - 2024-06-25 01:10 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-25 02:10 +0200
      Re: Security review of tag2upload Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org> - 2024-06-25 03:40 +0200
        Re: Security review of tag2upload Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-06-26 09:30 +0200
          Re: Security review of tag2upload Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2024-06-26 09:50 +0200
            Re: Security review of tag2upload Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2024-06-26 10:40 +0200
              Re: Security review of tag2upload Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk> - 2024-06-26 12:40 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2024-06-25 11:30 +0200
    Re: Security review of tag2upload Matthias Urlichs <matthias@urlichs.de> - 2024-06-25 12:10 +0200

csiph-web