Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #286701
| From | rhkramer@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find |
| Date | 2026-05-16 20:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MVrCx-5CHc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
I tend to avoid the use of find (1) because I never really "internalized" the syntax) and (2) on the assumption that it hits the disk "harder" than locate. I mean, updatedb runs once a day (on my systems) and I assume (I know) that its database is mostly cached somewhere, but I don't really know how it finds new files. Is there any validity to the idea that find is harder on disks (hits them more often / more widely) than locate?
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
(slightly OT?) Disk usage of find rhkramer@gmail.com - 2026-05-16 20:10 +0200
Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2026-05-16 20:50 +0200
Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find "mick.crane" <mick.crane@gmail.com> - 2026-05-17 01:00 +0200
Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find Andrew Latham <lathama@gmail.com> - 2026-05-16 21:40 +0200
Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find Chime Hart <chime@hubert-humphrey.com> - 2026-05-16 20:30 +0200
Re: (slightly OT?) Disk usage of find David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2026-05-17 05:30 +0200
csiph-web