Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.security > #4300

Re: [PATCH] Re: Logjam mitigation for Wheezy?

From Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.security
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: Logjam mitigation for Wheezy?
Date 2015-06-11 22:50 +0200
Message-ID <pAhAf-fl-49@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <pz2ad-3Lv-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzcsW-2dO-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzdyF-3M8-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pzpTc-57Y-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <pAg1s-6ty-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


micah dixit:

>> (as I have been doing for a while) that even the DH part of the handshake be
>> protected by the server (and, optionally, client) certificate.
>
>This doesn't mean anything, as far as I can tell. Unless you mean "by

Encrypted, actually, is what I mean.

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
> Wish I had pine to hand :-( I'll give lynx a try, thanks.

Michael Schmitz on nntp://news.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k
a.k.a. {news.gmane.org/nntp}#news.gmane.linux.debian.ports.68k in pine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/Pine.BSM.4.64L.1506112033580.1248@herc.mirbsd.org

Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: [PATCH] Re: Logjam mitigation for Wheezy? Stefan Fritsch <sf@sfritsch.de> - 2015-06-06 14:30 +0200
  Re: [PATCH] Re: Logjam mitigation for Wheezy? Thorsten Glaser <tg@mirbsd.de> - 2015-06-11 22:50 +0200

csiph-web