Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #6217
| From | Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security, linux.debian.devel.release |
| Subject | should the Release Notes be updated concerning bookworm security |
| Date | 2023-05-29 14:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <GAKkh-ceNq-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Dear security team, I know it's a bit late, but are you aware of issues that are worth mentioning in the release notes from your point of view? We have updated the text about golang and rustc in this cycle, chromium got a mention about reduce support time wise and I updated the openjdk versions and dates. Is that all? Paul Current version jumping straight to the security section: https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#limited-security-support or the source: https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
should the Release Notes be updated concerning bookworm security Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-05-29 14:40 +0200 Re: should the Release Notes be updated concerning bookworm security Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-06-01 16:50 +0200
csiph-web