Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.security > #6195
| From | Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.security |
| Subject | Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? |
| Date | 2023-01-26 10:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FS6TD-1fys-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <FM0nT-gHda-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FQrSy-aOC-25@gated-at.bofh.it> <FRTD3-16Zh-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <FS6gV-1f4y-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FS6qB-1fnO-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Nilesh, On 26-01-2023 10:06, Nilesh Patra wrote: > I guess something that changed since then is that upstream is aware > about it and can help a bit with backporting. However the onus to > maintain it in stable is still on the maintainer and security@ (to some > extent) > It is bit of a high-effort maintainance (in stable) as far as I can see. I may (or may not) be misunderstanding you. As a maintainer, it's up to you to commit to the effort. If you're up to it and judge it's feasible, I'm not going to block you on that. I understood you raised a concern about it being feasible, that's why we ended up here. If you commit (obviously best effort, but we'll expect you to spend time on it) *and* the security team agrees that with your commitment it's supportable, I'll remove my concern. Our concern is that we *don't* want new versions in stable to fix security issues if those new versions are not bugfix-only releases. We have to accept that for browsers, because shipping without them seems like a disservice to nearly all of our users, but still it's something we really don't like. > fasttrack still has much less visibility / availability than > an official stable release, or even backports. Obviously that will only be solved if it's more used (and/or if eventually it can be moved to the debian.org namespace.) But indeed. Paul
Back to linux.debian.security | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2023-01-09 14:30 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org> - 2023-01-21 20:40 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org> - 2023-01-25 20:30 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 10:00 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 10:10 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 10:40 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Sam Hartman <hartmans@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 16:30 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2023-01-26 18:00 +0100
Re: Should singularity-container make it to next release? Nilesh Patra <nilesh@nileshpatra.info> - 2023-01-26 20:50 +0100
csiph-web