Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9227 > unrolled thread

Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with exposed calling script

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with  exposed calling script Thomas Nyberg <tomuxiong@gmx.com> - 2017-02-07 15:00 +0100
    Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with  exposed calling script Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2017-02-07 15:20 +0100
      Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with  exposed calling script Thomas Nyberg <tomuxiong@gmx.com> - 2017-02-07 18:50 +0100

#9227 — Re: Best way to package a python module which is "private" with exposed calling script

Hi Simon,

Thank you very much for the response!

I've been looking at the offlineimap package on my system (jessie), but 
in my case `/usr/bin/offlineimap` is _not_ a symlink. Also the python 
code is not installed to `/usr/share/offlineimap` and instead to 
`/usr/share/pyshared/offlineimap/` and so if I start a normal 
interpreter `import offlineimap` does work (which I'd rather it not). Am 
I completely missing something here or did you possibly mean another 
example package?

Cheers,
Thomas

P.S. I forgot to subscribe to the list before sending the last email and 
had to hack in the `In-reply-to` value this time. For any readers, in 
case I got this wrong this is the post I'm replying to:

https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2017/02/msg00018.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#9230

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:50:02AM -0500, Thomas Nyberg wrote:
> I've been looking at the offlineimap package on my system (jessie), but in
> my case `/usr/bin/offlineimap` is _not_ a symlink. Also the python code is
> not installed to `/usr/share/offlineimap` and instead to
> `/usr/share/pyshared/offlineimap/` and so if I start a normal interpreter
> `import offlineimap` does work (which I'd rather it not). Am I completely
> missing something here or did you possibly mean another example package?
You should look at the sid package version, it's different there.

-- 
WBR, wRAR

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#9231

On 02/07/2017 08:54 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 08:50:02AM -0500, Thomas Nyberg wrote:
> You should look at the sid package version, it's different there.
>

Thanks a lot! (Should have been an obvious first step...)

And thanks a lot everyone else!

Also I figure I might as well mention on this list that I went through 
and put together a bare-bones example for myself. There are always minor 
finicky things with this (at least for me) so I figure I might as well 
link it in this thread for any future internet travelers. Might save 
them a little hassle...

https://github.com/ApproximateIdentity/debian-private-package

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web