Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16281 > unrolled thread

Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation

Started bySoren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
First post2024-09-16 23:00 +0200
Last post2024-10-29 20:50 +0100
Articles 2 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python


Contents

  Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 23:00 +0200
    Re: Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 20:50 +0100

#16281 — Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation

FromSoren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Date2024-09-16 23:00 +0200
SubjectQuestions about inconsistencies in the documentation
Message-ID<JnqZc-cLL8-37@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

While reading over the documentation I noticed a couple of inconsistencies.

1.
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/
policy.rst

"All team members should of course follow the main discussion list:
debian-python@lists.debian.org”

"Team members who have broad interest should subscribe to the mailing list
debian-python@lists.debian.org whereas members who are only interested in some
packages should use the Package Tracking System to follow the packages."

I am already subscribed to the list, so I am not concerned about this 
personally.  But it seems like we ought to pick one recommendation on this 
subject.

2.
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/
policy.rst

"debian/master - The Debianized upstream source directory.”

https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging

"debian/main (formerly debian/master) - The Debianized upstream source 
directory.”

"To prove that all the branches got pushed correctly, in this fresh clone, 
checkout the debian/master”

"You will need to push the debian/master branch”

"Set debian-branch value to debian/master in debian/gbp.conf”

"Commit to debian/master branch (use git branch -m master debian/master to 
rename the branch).”

"Update .git/config branch debian/master to refer to merge = refs/heads/debian/
master.”

"On Salsa, set the default branch to the new debian/master branch.”

“debian-branch=debian/master”

etc. (there are quite a few other references to debian/master).

I am uncertain whether debian/master or debian/main is recommended.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#16409

FromSoren Stoutner <soren@debian.org>
Date2024-10-29 20:50 +0100
Message-ID<JD0o2-59WL-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#16281

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Does anyone have any comments on making the documentation more consistent?

On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:59:09 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote:
> While reading over the documentation I noticed a couple of inconsistencies.
> 
> 1.
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/
> policy.rst
> 
> "All team members should of course follow the main discussion list:
> debian-python@lists.debian.org”
> 
> "Team members who have broad interest should subscribe to the mailing list
> debian-python@lists.debian.org whereas members who are only interested in 
some
> packages should use the Package Tracking System to follow the packages."
> 
> I am already subscribed to the list, so I am not concerned about this
> personally.  But it seems like we ought to pick one recommendation on this
> subject.
> 
> 2.
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/
> policy.rst
> 
> "debian/master - The Debianized upstream source directory.”
> 
> https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging
> 
> "debian/main (formerly debian/master) - The Debianized upstream source
> directory.”
> 
> "To prove that all the branches got pushed correctly, in this fresh clone,
> checkout the debian/master”
> 
> "You will need to push the debian/master branch”
> 
> "Set debian-branch value to debian/master in debian/gbp.conf”
> 
> "Commit to debian/master branch (use git branch -m master debian/master to
> rename the branch).”
> 
> "Update .git/config branch debian/master to refer to merge =
> refs/heads/debian/ master.”
> 
> "On Salsa, set the default branch to the new debian/master branch.”
> 
> “debian-branch=debian/master”
> 
> etc. (there are quite a few other references to debian/master).
> 
> I am uncertain whether debian/master or debian/main is recommended.


-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web