Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16281 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-09-16 23:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-10-29 20:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-09-16 23:00 +0200
Re: Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 20:50 +0100
| From | Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-09-16 23:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Questions about inconsistencies in the documentation |
| Message-ID | <JnqZc-cLL8-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
While reading over the documentation I noticed a couple of inconsistencies. 1. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ policy.rst "All team members should of course follow the main discussion list: debian-python@lists.debian.org” "Team members who have broad interest should subscribe to the mailing list debian-python@lists.debian.org whereas members who are only interested in some packages should use the Package Tracking System to follow the packages." I am already subscribed to the list, so I am not concerned about this personally. But it seems like we ought to pick one recommendation on this subject. 2. https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ policy.rst "debian/master - The Debianized upstream source directory.” https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging "debian/main (formerly debian/master) - The Debianized upstream source directory.” "To prove that all the branches got pushed correctly, in this fresh clone, checkout the debian/master” "You will need to push the debian/master branch” "Set debian-branch value to debian/master in debian/gbp.conf” "Commit to debian/master branch (use git branch -m master debian/master to rename the branch).” "Update .git/config branch debian/master to refer to merge = refs/heads/debian/ master.” "On Salsa, set the default branch to the new debian/master branch.” “debian-branch=debian/master” etc. (there are quite a few other references to debian/master). I am uncertain whether debian/master or debian/main is recommended. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-10-29 20:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JD0o2-59WL-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #16281 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Does anyone have any comments on making the documentation more consistent? On Monday, September 16, 2024 1:59:09 PM MST Soren Stoutner wrote: > While reading over the documentation I noticed a couple of inconsistencies. > > 1. > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ > policy.rst > > "All team members should of course follow the main discussion list: > debian-python@lists.debian.org” > > "Team members who have broad interest should subscribe to the mailing list > debian-python@lists.debian.org whereas members who are only interested in some > packages should use the Package Tracking System to follow the packages." > > I am already subscribed to the list, so I am not concerned about this > personally. But it seems like we ought to pick one recommendation on this > subject. > > 2. > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/ > policy.rst > > "debian/master - The Debianized upstream source directory.” > > https://wiki.debian.org/Python/GitPackaging > > "debian/main (formerly debian/master) - The Debianized upstream source > directory.” > > "To prove that all the branches got pushed correctly, in this fresh clone, > checkout the debian/master” > > "You will need to push the debian/master branch” > > "Set debian-branch value to debian/master in debian/gbp.conf” > > "Commit to debian/master branch (use git branch -m master debian/master to > rename the branch).” > > "Update .git/config branch debian/master to refer to merge = > refs/heads/debian/ master.” > > "On Salsa, set the default branch to the new debian/master branch.” > > “debian-branch=debian/master” > > etc. (there are quite a few other references to debian/master). > > I am uncertain whether debian/master or debian/main is recommended. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web