Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16490 > unrolled thread

Fwd: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x?

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Fwd: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x? Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2024-11-25 10:40 +0100
    Re: Fwd: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x? Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2024-11-29 08:40 +0100

#16490 — Fwd: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x?

Hrhr, I need to forward my answer to Thomas to the Debian Python Team as 
even in my initial email I mixed up the correct email address from the 
DPT. Sorry. :-(


-------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re: Updating Flask and Werkzeug to 3.1.x?
Datum: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:37:10 +0100
Von: Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de>
An: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>, Debian Python Team 
<team+python@tracker.debian.org>

Hello Thomas,

Am 23.11.24 um 13:36 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
...
> Hi Carsten,
> 
> Thanks for your work, and thanks for letting us know what you intend to
> do regarding these packages.
> 
> Uploading to experimental and checking for the excuse page for any
> autopkgtest regression is the correct workflow. You do not need my
> approval to do so. Please go ahead, and thanks in advance for your
> contribution: that's much appreciated, especially for such high profile
> packages.

thanks for confirming my point of view. We did the same one yer ago and 
it worked well that way.
But I wanted to ask you somehow as you are currently listed in the 
Uploaders field.

I've done the uploads of Werkzeug and also Flask yesterday and at least 
for python-werkzeug it looks promising I'd say. No broken tests until 
now. Fingers crossed!

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-werkzeug

The package flask will need some more time so the autopkgtests can get 
executed against 3.1.3-1.

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=flask

-- 
Regards
Carsten

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#16493

Hi Thomas and DPT,

this update went (a bit unexpected :-) ) very well! But yeah, now 
Werkzeug and also Flask are up to date in unstable/testing! Not one 
single package needed any additional work.

Am 25.11.24 um 10:39 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
> Hrhr, I need to forward my answer to Thomas to the Debian Python Team as
> even in my initial email I mixed up the correct email address from the
> DPT. Sorry. :-(

...
> 
> Hello Thomas,
> 
> Am 23.11.24 um 13:36 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
> ...
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> Thanks for your work, and thanks for letting us know what you intend to
>> do regarding these packages.
>>
>> Uploading to experimental and checking for the excuse page for any
>> autopkgtest regression is the correct workflow. You do not need my
>> approval to do so. Please go ahead, and thanks in advance for your
>> contribution: that's much appreciated, especially for such high profile
>> packages.
> 
> thanks for confirming my point of view. We did the same one yer ago and
> it worked well that way.
> But I wanted to ask you somehow as you are currently listed in the
> Uploaders field.
> 
> I've done the uploads of Werkzeug and also Flask yesterday and at least
> for python-werkzeug it looks promising I'd say. No broken tests until
> now. Fingers crossed!
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-werkzeug
> 
> The package flask will need some more time so the autopkgtests can get
> executed against 3.1.3-1.
> 
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=flask
> 

-- 
Regards
Carsten

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web