Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15554 > unrolled thread

Bug#1060736: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric?

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Bug#1060736: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric? Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2024-03-11 22:20 +0100
    Bug#1054171: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric? Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-03-11 23:20 +0100
    Bug#1060736: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric? Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2024-03-18 18:00 +0100

#15554 — Bug#1060736: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric?

Hi Gudjon,

in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the
debian-python mailing list[1] would you agree to set DPT as maintainer?
If yes, I'd volunteer to do this, fix bug #1065855 and #1060736.

Kind regards and thanks for working on this package
    Andreas.


[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#15555 — Bug#1054171: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric?

Hi Jan,

I see on the tracker that you have both set the LowNMU flag (like I did too)
and also made use of the special rule of the DPT policy discussed from [1];
that seems a bit of a contradiction to me but I have read that
it was the default behaviour of some source package templating tool
which might explain where it came from.

Would you agree to swap Maintainer & Uploader fields like proposed ?

My offer to refresh the package still stands on.
I would need this anyway for my work anyway in the coming months,
that seems like a waste of time not to share this work.
(we are currently using the bookworm .deb on buster and it justs works...)

Greetings

[0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-pika

Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 22:30, Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> a écrit :
>
> Hi Gudjon,
>
> in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the
> debian-python mailing list[1] would you agree to set DPT as maintainer?
> If yes, I'd volunteer to do this, fix bug #1065855 and #1060736.
>
> Kind regards and thanks for working on this package
>     Andreas.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15614

Control: tags -1 pending
thanks

Hi again,

since I know you from Debian Science team and you are usually
comfortable with setting Maintainer to the team I've done so
besides fixing the bug and polished the package a bit.  I also
upgraded to the latest upstream version.

Please confirm that this all is OK before I upload (feel free
to upload yourself which is perfectly fine for me).

Kind regards
    Andreas.

Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 10:13:50PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> Hi Gudjon,
> 
> in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the
> debian-python mailing list[1] would you agree to set DPT as maintainer?
> If yes, I'd volunteer to do this, fix bug #1065855 and #1060736.
> 
> Kind regards and thanks for working on this package
>     Andreas.
> 
> 
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web