Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15981 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-06-29 22:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2024-06-29 23:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Simple module for python-based cgi? Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> - 2024-06-29 22:10 +0200
Re: Simple module for python-based cgi? Fay Stegerman <flx@obfusk.net> - 2024-06-29 22:30 +0200
Re: Simple module for python-based cgi? eevelweezel <eevel.weezel@gmail.com> - 2024-06-29 23:50 +0200
| From | Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-29 22:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Simple module for python-based cgi? |
| Message-ID | <IUMhM-6vXu-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hello, I used to use the cgi module to implement simple python-based cgi scripts for mere http forms. But it is getting deprecated https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#cgi and concerning form support: FieldStorage/MiniFieldStorage has no direct replacement, but can typically be replaced by using multipart (https://pypi.org/project/multipart/) (for POST and PUT requests) or urllib.parse.parse_qsl (for GET and HEAD requests) But that multipart project doesn't seem to be packaged in Debian? (python-multipart seems to be something else, that doesn't seem to actually provide form content?) Do we actually have something in Debian python to replace cgi's FieldStorage in a simple way? Samuel
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fay Stegerman <flx@obfusk.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-29 22:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IUMRQ-6wrY-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15981 |
* Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> [2024-06-29 21:46]: > I used to use the cgi module to implement simple python-based cgi > scripts for mere http forms. But it is getting deprecated > https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#cgi > and concerning form support: > > FieldStorage/MiniFieldStorage has no direct replacement, > but can typically be replaced by using multipart > (https://pypi.org/project/multipart/) (for POST and PUT requests) or > urllib.parse.parse_qsl (for GET and HEAD requests) > > But that multipart project doesn't seem to be packaged in Debian? > (python-multipart seems to be something else, that doesn't seem to > actually provide form content?) > > Do we actually have something in Debian python to replace cgi's > FieldStorage in a simple way? I haven't used it myself so I'm not sure it would fit your use case, and it might not exactly count as "simple", but Debian does have python3-requests-toolbelt which seems to provide a requests_toolbelt.multipart.decoder.MultipartDecoder. - Fay
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | eevelweezel <eevel.weezel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2024-06-29 23:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <IUO7f-6x9k-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15981 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
If you are looking for something in the stdlib, I believe the recommendation is to use email.message. On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 12:47 Samuel Thibault <sthibault@debian.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I used to use the cgi module to implement simple python-based cgi > scripts for mere http forms. But it is getting deprecated > https://peps.python.org/pep-0594/#cgi > and concerning form support: > > FieldStorage/MiniFieldStorage has no direct replacement, > but can typically be replaced by using multipart > (https://pypi.org/project/multipart/) (for POST and PUT requests) or > urllib.parse.parse_qsl (for GET and HEAD requests) > > But that multipart project doesn't seem to be packaged in Debian? > (python-multipart seems to be something else, that doesn't seem to > actually provide form content?) > > Do we actually have something in Debian python to replace cgi's > FieldStorage in a simple way? > > Samuel > >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web