Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15893 > unrolled thread

Request to join the Python packaging team

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

Contents

  Request to join the Python packaging team "Federico Ceratto" <federico.ceratto@posteo.com> - 2024-06-03 18:20 +0200
    Re: Request to join the Python packaging team Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2024-06-12 11:40 +0200
      urllib3 v2.0.7-1 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 12:00 +0200
        Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1 stefanor@debian.org - 2024-06-12 12:20 +0200
          Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1 Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> - 2024-06-12 15:50 +0200
            Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-06-12 20:40 +0200
            Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-06-16 23:00 +0200
              Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1 Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2024-06-21 08:50 +0200

#15893 — Request to join the Python packaging team

Hello,

I was in the DPMT back when it was on Alioth and I would like to join
it again. My Salsa login is "federico".

I have read the policy and I accept it:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/blob/master/policy.rst

Thank you!
--
Federico

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#15909

Hi Federico (2024.06.03_16:11:27_+0000)
> I was in the DPMT back when it was on Alioth and I would like to join
> it again. My Salsa login is "federico".

Added, welcome back

Stefano

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15910 — urllib3 v2.0.7-1

Hi,

Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
(more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)

It is in Ubuntu stable [0] with very little breakage so far [1]:

[0] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-urllib

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-chemspipy/-/commit/693d4c9e474a58149cf5c70a404e32d1a48b2d3d

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15911 — Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1

Hi Alexandre (2024.06.12_09:56:21_+0000)
> Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
> (more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)

Sounds reasonable to me. I can't remember my concerns with doing it
before. Probably just seemed to risky to try without rebuilds.

Stefano

-- 
Stefano Rivera
  http://tumbleweed.org.za/
  +1 415 683 3272

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15912 — Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1

Hello!

On 6/12/24 11:56, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
 > Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
 > (more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)

Please go ahead, and thanks!


On 6/12/24 12:18, stefanor@debian.org wrote:
> Sounds reasonable to me. I can't remember my concerns with doing it
> before. Probably just seemed to risky to try without rebuilds.

Yes, it was for testing... maybe at the time the requests version we ad 
was not supporting urllib3 v2? I also don't remember the details, but I 
remember that the purpose of the experimental upload was to perform more 
testing.

Daniele

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15913 — Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1

There was a timebomb in the code ... :-(

It did worked on 2023-11-12, it fails from 2024-01-01 ...

> assert RECENT_DATE > (datetime.datetime.today() - two_years).date()
2777E AssertionError: assert datetime.date(2022, 1, 1) >
datetime.date(2022, 6, 13)


Then it breaks again because some exception strings changed since in a
lower SSL layer
(python-cryptography ...?) I check this.

Greetings



Le mer. 12 juin 2024 à 15:36, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> On 6/12/24 11:56, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
>  > Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
>  > (more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)
>
> Please go ahead, and thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15940 — Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1

Here comes the breakage ... (thanks Lucas)
this breaks actually more things than the Urllib3 2.x version bump.

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240615;users=lucas@debian.org

#1073360 [S|⛺|  ] [src:fabric] fabric: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No
module named 'six'
#1073361 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-ldappool] python-ldappool: FTBFS:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
#1073365 [S|⛺|  ] [src:django-cas-server] django-cas-server: FTBFS:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
#1073366 [S|⛺|  ] [src:ansible-runner] ansible-runner: FTBFS:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
#1073368 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-flickrapi] python-flickrapi: FTBFS:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
#1073371 [S|⛺|  ] [src:gitsome] gitsome: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError:
No module named 'six'
#1073376 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-fedora] python-fedora: FTBFS:
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
#1073487 [S|⛺|  ] [src:cdist] cdist: FTBFS: Could not import extension
cdist.sphinxext.manpage (exception: No module named 'six')
#1073488 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-releases] python-releases: FTBFS: Could
not import extension releases (exception: No module named 'six')

Le mer. 12 juin 2024 à 15:36, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> a écrit :
>
> Hello!
>
> On 6/12/24 11:56, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
>  > Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
>  > (more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)
>
> Please go ahead, and thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#15959 — Re: urllib3 v2.0.7-1

I fixed this one too, now a little VAC.

"fabric" is the most complex one.

-----

ansible-runner (2.4.0-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium

 + Non-maintainer upload.
 * New upstream version 2.4.0 (Closes: #1073366, #1068087)
 * Add dependency on pybuild-plugin-pyproject
 * Remove dependency on python3-mock (Closes: #1068086)
 * Add watch file
 * Add gbp.conf matching existing repos
 * Use new dh-sequence-python3



Le dim. 16 juin 2024 à 22:55, Alexandre Detiste
<alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> Here comes the breakage ... (thanks Lucas)
> this breaks actually more things than the Urllib3 2.x version bump.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ftbfs-20240615;users=lucas@debian.org
>
> #1073360 [S|⛺|  ] [src:fabric] fabric: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError: No
> module named 'six'
> #1073361 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-ldappool] python-ldappool: FTBFS:
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
> #1073365 [S|⛺|  ] [src:django-cas-server] django-cas-server: FTBFS:
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
> #1073366 [S|⛺|  ] [src:ansible-runner] ansible-runner: FTBFS:
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
> #1073368 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-flickrapi] python-flickrapi: FTBFS:
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
> #1073371 [S|⛺|  ] [src:gitsome] gitsome: FTBFS: ModuleNotFoundError:
> No module named 'six'
> #1073376 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-fedora] python-fedora: FTBFS:
> ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'six'
> #1073487 [S|⛺|  ] [src:cdist] cdist: FTBFS: Could not import extension
> cdist.sphinxext.manpage (exception: No module named 'six')
> #1073488 [S|⛺|  ] [src:python-releases] python-releases: FTBFS: Could
> not import extension releases (exception: No module named 'six')
>
> Le mer. 12 juin 2024 à 15:36, Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> a écrit :
> >
> > Hello!
> >
> > On 6/12/24 11:56, Alexandre Detiste wrote:
> >  > Can we upload urllib3 v2.0.7 to unstable ?
> >  > (more recent versions breaks backward compatibility)
> >
> > Please go ahead, and thanks!

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python

csiph-web