Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15755 > unrolled thread

Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

Started byAndreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
First post2024-04-07 14:00 +0200
Last post2024-05-22 11:10 +0200
Articles 7 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> - 2024-04-07 14:00 +0200
    Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-04-08 01:40 +0200
      Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> - 2024-04-09 10:40 +0200
        Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-12 13:00 +0200
          Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> - 2024-05-13 00:50 +0200
            Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-22 11:20 +0200
          Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> - 2024-05-22 11:10 +0200

#15755 — Bug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library

FromAndreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
Date2024-04-07 14:00 +0200
SubjectBug#1065221: O: py7zr -- pure Python 7-zip library
Message-ID<IqzlL-4Fbh-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi again,


Am Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 11:54:00AM +0900 schrieb yokota:
> Hello,
> 
> I think these packages are now ready for upload to NEW queue.
> Please examine them.
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-brotlicffi

See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065221#47 where I
forgot to CC Debian Python list.

> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-inflate64

Uploaded as well.  I had to strip d/changelog and fixed the spelling of
"python" in description.  Please verify this for the next two packages.
I've also spotted third party code which was not mentioned in
d/copyright.

I'd recommend to do some

   grep -Ri copyright 

in your source tree to have a rough information about code that is
possibly missing in d/copyright.  Otherwise the package will be rejected
by ftpmaster.

> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyppmd
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/python-pyzstd

Thanks a lot for your work in any case
    Andreas. 

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#15756

Fromyokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>
Date2024-04-08 01:40 +0200
Message-ID<IqKhb-4LOu-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15755
Hello,

> When writing this I'm wondering whether it might be better to remove
> this in Files-Excluded.  On one hand this saves us from mentioning the
> copyright on the other hand we could be really sure that it is not used.
> What do you think - should I override the previous upload without that
> code copy?  I did not wanted to be too invasive with your packaging
> but I would have done so in my packages.

Thanks for your suggestion.
I was dropped embedded library code from brotlicffi and pyzstd, and push
them to salsa.debian.org repository.

I was also fix some copyright issues.

--
YOKOTA Hiroshi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#15758

FromAndreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de>
Date2024-04-09 10:40 +0200
Message-ID<Irfbk-54VY-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15756
Hi Hiroshi,

Am Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 08:34:23AM +0900 schrieb yokota:
> > When writing this I'm wondering whether it might be better to remove
> > this in Files-Excluded.  On one hand this saves us from mentioning the
> > copyright on the other hand we could be really sure that it is not used.
> > What do you think - should I override the previous upload without that
> > code copy?  I did not wanted to be too invasive with your packaging
> > but I would have done so in my packages.
> 
> Thanks for your suggestion.
> I was dropped embedded library code from brotlicffi

I commited a change to d/changelog.  In case ftpmaster might accept what
currently is in new queue we need to mention this.  Alternatively I
could push the new version to new since as far as I know ftpmaster can
cope with this.  However, I do not see any urgent need for this.  We can
rather upload your change in the source-only upload after the package
might have been accepted.  In case it will not be accepted we can change
d/changelog accordingly.

> and pyzstd, and push
> them to salsa.debian.org repository.
> 
> I was also fix some copyright issues.

Fine.  I've uploaded python-pyppmd and python-pyzstd to new.  Please
read my commit logs for python-pyzstd. 

Thanks a lot for all your work and ping here on this list if you need
further sponsoring help.

Kind regards
    Andreas.

-- 
https://fam-tille.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#15829

Fromyokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>
Date2024-05-12 13:00 +0200
Message-ID<IDf5T-cOKx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15758
Hello Étienne,

py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.
Please examine salsa repository and upload to Debian if it looks well.

https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/py7zr

--
YOKOTA Hiroshi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#15831

Fromyokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com>
Date2024-05-13 00:50 +0200
Message-ID<IDqaZ-cW40-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15829
Hello Étienne,

> py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.

py7zr 0.21 is now split-out all architecture-dependent binary module
to external python modules.
And py7zr target architecture is changed to "all".
I think we send RM request to Debian release team to drop old
architecture-dependent packages.

--
YOKOTA Hiroshi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#15857

FromÉtienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Date2024-05-22 11:20 +0200
Message-ID<IGQiB-f2nE-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15831

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

yokota, on 2024-05-13:
> py7zr 0.21 is now split-out all architecture-dependent binary module
> to external python modules.
> And py7zr target architecture is changed to "all".
> I think we send RM request to Debian release team to drop old
> architecture-dependent packages.

Removal requests may not be necessary for an "any" to "all"
change, but lets keep an eye on how things are moving.  It's
possible I'm missing something (an upload to NEW?), or the
upload might just work.  We'll see.

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/0, please excuse my verbosity
   `-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#15860

FromÉtienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Date2024-05-22 11:10 +0200
Message-ID<IGQ8W-f2ki-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#15829

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Yokota,

yokota, on 2024-05-12:
> py7zr was ready for upload to Debian.
> Please examine salsa repository and upload to Debian if it looks well.

I reviewed through your changes in py7zr and ran a couple of
tests, notably the ones from the reverse dependency "calibre".
I have not seen matter for comments, the package looked suitable
for upload to unstable to me, so I proceeded.  Congratulations!

Thank you for your contribution!

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
  .''`.  Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
 : :' :  pgp: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
 `. `'   sent from /dev/pts/0, please excuse my verbosity
   `-

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web