Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15185 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-09-16 12:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-09-24 12:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> - 2023-09-16 12:40 +0200
Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> - 2023-09-24 11:30 +0200
Re: Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-09-24 12:20 +0200
| From | Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-16 12:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Bug#1052028: please update to pydantic 2.x |
| Message-ID | <HeASt-9lXc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Source: pydantic Version: 1.10.4-1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Dear maintainer, I would like to have pydantic updated to the latest 2.x major release, because rstcheck depends on it. The 2.x API has some breaking changes, but according to the pydantic README, version 1.10.4 is shipped as pydantic.v1 legacy module. Therefore, any reverse dependency which is incompatible with the 2.x API can be fixed trivially at import level. As pydantic is only weakly team managed, I am submitting this wishlist bug, but I am willing to do the grunt work for this and provide the necessary team uploads. I cc'd the Python team mailing list as advance notice for the maintainers of affected reverse dependencies. Cheers Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmUFgtIACgkQ+C8H+466 LVlPWgwA48KvUKxcwuy9DEQKH6jPaa7g8vNJXIz7EdXnqhUJAVUlDV+7nJ4T5+rJ aesvqHpC6NE76Okkm76UhPk3wwCvsvoww+Ib4OHMKfYt9f1QS3FvQvMRSQWZrUpq +AB0nPfUxc5HepCcH+prshDeUkJ5QmotqeMZTmDbdmZmpHyyF1hAz+0BfgXuJlSg Gpyew8M/qm4IiN04wdG34JwyVTSGutxcHNV8o4cnupp7TuiYpLFVDVYkeJkdWYq1 vFIH80pHfTvDX+2Gk+KlfJA4tcPxvMu2sZm3S4OvIYSq97FeVWLHBUiZmNYboXIe doiAC87EFEo/NTjv1xFXzjKYz27ae/XTpTVgS2FD2U1YUYyYUtr88423QrtvUGnz gDiz+efixPsdy3H26yH1x/Y6qRLQWnag3dyXjPx3xUZgDe0Merhrm5C9Djk8ZKD4 9WuSLNVwXit3n6MMZRZHIdNO/QVxYyFsPSobytXRluroxWVYhOYeSH+uEOhvBYLl qhf317wZ =6qsd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Salvo Tomaselli <tiposchi@tiscali.it> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 11:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HhtB8-bbWK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15185 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Wouldn't it be better to package it as python3-pydantic2 directly? To avoid
breaking every software that uses it.
In that way they could just coexist and packages depending on the old one
wouldn't all suddenly break.
Best
--
Salvo Tomaselli
"Io non mi sento obbligato a credere che lo stesso Dio che ci ha dotato di
senso, ragione ed intelletto intendesse che noi ne facessimo a meno."
-- Galileo Galilei
http://ltworf.github.io/ltworf/
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-09-24 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <Hhunv-bct7-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15211 |
On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:25:09AM +0200, Salvo Tomaselli wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to package it as python3-pydantic2 directly? To avoid > breaking every software that uses it. > > In that way they could just coexist and packages depending on the old one > wouldn't all suddenly break. We don't usually do such things for Python libraries when they have the same import name.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web