Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-12-17 20:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2023-12-18 00:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 4 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Bug#1057995: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> - 2023-12-17 20:20 +0100
Bug#1057995: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> - 2023-12-17 20:30 +0100
Re: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> - 2023-12-17 20:40 +0100
Re: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> - 2023-12-18 00:00 +0100
| From | Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-17 20:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Bug#1057995: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) |
| Message-ID | <HM4Q9-efUE-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi,
I checked debian/obitools.substvars which contains
python3:Depends=cython3-legacy, python3 (<< 3.12), python3 (>= 3.11~), python3-ipython, python3-sphinx, python3-virtualenv, python3-wheel, python3:any
I wonder what mechanism is responsible for adding cython3-legacy to the
package dependencies. This looks absolutely unmotivated to me. Is there
any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by
adding some override_dh_gencontrol?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-17 20:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <HM4ZP-efXA-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15363 |
Hi Andreas On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 18:15, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > Is there > any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by > adding some override_dh_gencontrol? Remove the line: Cython>=0.24 from requirements.txt. Regards Graham
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Alexandre Detiste <alexandre.detiste@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-17 20:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) |
| Message-ID | <HM59v-eg0B-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15364 |
The worse thing is when upstreams ask you to sign a CLA to accept a PR that removes one extraneous line from requirements.txt. Is it even copyrightable ? Le dim. 17 déc. 2023 à 20:21, Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> a écrit : > > Hi Andreas > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 18:15, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > > Is there > > any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by > > adding some override_dh_gencontrol? > > Remove the line: > > Cython>=0.24 > > from requirements.txt.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-12-18 00:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Why is ${python3:Depends} injecting cython3-legacy (Was: obitools: runtime dependency on cython) |
| Message-ID | <HM8h3-ehKg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #15365 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 08:38:30PM +0100, Alexandre Detiste wrote: > The worse thing is when upstreams ask you to sign a CLA to accept > a PR that removes one extraneous line from requirements.txt. > Is it even copyrightable ? Even under the more absurd European interpretations that allow copyright on various works with no minimum element of creativity, I think the answer is no, removal of a line of text is not copyrightable. So let the upstream figure it out? <shrug> > Le dim. 17 déc. 2023 à 20:21, Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> a écrit : > > > > Hi Andreas > > > > On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 18:15, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote: > > > Is there > > > any better way than editing debian/obitools.substvars in d/rules by > > > adding some override_dh_gencontrol? > > > > Remove the line: > > > > Cython>=0.24 > > > > from requirements.txt. > -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slangasek@ubuntu.com vorlon@debian.org
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web