Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15107 > unrolled thread

Re: Review of package dunamai

Started byNicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org>
First post2023-08-09 16:20 +0200
Last post2023-08-09 16:20 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Review of package dunamai Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2023-08-09 16:20 +0200

#15107 — Re: Review of package dunamai

FromNicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org>
Date2023-08-09 16:20 +0200
SubjectRe: Review of package dunamai
Message-ID<H0Scy-C60-23@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes:

> Hmm, whatever? It's really a matter of personal preferences. I tend to 
> be lazy and not want to build on experimental because the sbuild script 
> is more tedious... :)
>

Can I interest you in testing a wrapper script that I've been thinking
about sharing for a while now?  Basically it does a bunch of safety
checks and convenience things, then builds for the right distro, then
tags if the build was successful.  Thus far it's based on a gbp
paradigm, but some people on debian-backports said it would be nice if
it could take source packages as input.  Long-term, I'm not convinced
that it would be a good fit for devscripts or git-build-package, since
it's something in between.

As you noted, experimental is its own case, as are backports, stable
updates, security uploads, and I also don't like to think sbuild
incantations.  Maybe I should call the script dtrt-build? ;)

Cheers,
Nicholas

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python


csiph-web