Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #15107 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2023-08-09 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2023-08-09 16:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.debian.maint.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Review of package dunamai Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2023-08-09 16:20 +0200
| From | Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-08-09 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Review of package dunamai |
| Message-ID | <H0Scy-C60-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes: > Hmm, whatever? It's really a matter of personal preferences. I tend to > be lazy and not want to build on experimental because the sbuild script > is more tedious... :) > Can I interest you in testing a wrapper script that I've been thinking about sharing for a while now? Basically it does a bunch of safety checks and convenience things, then builds for the right distro, then tags if the build was successful. Thus far it's based on a gbp paradigm, but some people on debian-backports said it would be nice if it could take source packages as input. Long-term, I'm not convinced that it would be a good fit for devscripts or git-build-package, since it's something in between. As you noted, experimental is its own case, as are backports, stable updates, security uploads, and I also don't like to think sbuild incantations. Maybe I should call the script dtrt-build? ;) Cheers, Nicholas
Back to top | Article view | linux.debian.maint.python
csiph-web