Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #9527
| Path | csiph.com!news.redatomik.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.unit0.net!news.panservice.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi@libpf.com> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python, linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16 |
| Date | Wed, 24 May 2017 11:50:02 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <tKAVP-wS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <sIL1w-5fn-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <sTMwV-11o-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Wed May 24 09:42:38 2017 |
| Old-Return-Path | <paolo.greppi@libpf.com> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-9.68 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -5 |
| X-Greylist | delayed 313 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at bendel; Wed, 24 May 2017 09:41:34 UTC |
| Reply-To | paolo.greppi@libpf.com |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=windows-1252 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Dkim-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aruba.it; s=a1; t=1495618576; bh=LTjpWLVLqeCehRkuzRV30zPf06EN1DWNgsPc0NkwSCs=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=KmFPZ7d8bCeCjTXoA9/f6yCJbp0OIE56TZcSQG0SOBzUxUjP8g6xMBNq/JERaZXQq toCMdu5fJrw8B4L5RfF6D3QCRVa/WBfnny7vYA3dPKDEL5g+yftGIUF8cDJbVKCKT1 WBz3lqpx7QgBMCEhkpCFwXg9/rp8FsWHB5EM3a4TMXnADs+b54AkYpnP24AtBFN3sn OfuHqSPmVzSSXc/6vEzOifq4Y5MWRdpcFh/1Z6xTxCgw+2IVkIoi2WKv6aaRBqQuZj DPEYW0C0PRiClh+s9QIFxheBH98WWaatD9CApM8ims35+SMI+gCbw8shamonhv/r+0 EHk4Q5vtjPGOw== |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/14904 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2d50fd9f-dc90-1027-6033-0c5098898289@libpf.com |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 106 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | mattia@debian.org, 845482@bugs.debian.org |
| X-Original-Date | Wed, 24 May 2017 11:36:10 +0200 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <2d50fd9f-dc90-1027-6033-0c5098898289@libpf.com> |
| X-Original-References | <351f9b0c-19bd-64ad-4fb7-33d5c6d8b05b@libpf.com> <20161229171739.cyqm5kec6vym5ukn@mapreri.org> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:9527 linux.debian.bugs.dist:825327 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Show key headers only | View raw
Il 29/12/2016 18:17, Mattia Rizzolo ha scritto: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 08:20:23AM +0100, Paolo Greppi wrote: >> Hi, > > Hi! > > FYI, I found your RFS only thanks to the /topic in #debian-python. > Unless you're very lucky most RFSes sent to random mailing lists have a > tendency to get lost/ignored; that's why I suggest you always file a RFS > bug and X-Debbugs-CC the relevant team, unless you know that team is > going to react (like pkg-js recently). OK thanks for the suggestion >> I packaged python-patch as per this ITP: >> https://bugs.debian.org/845482, this is the repo: >> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/python-modules/packages/python-patch.git >> >> Please someone more experienced than me review it and if it's OK sponsor >> its upload. > > I fixed the file name in the pristine-tar branch (otherwise `origtargz` > ignored it..). I rebuilt the repo from scratch anyway... >> Please note that since the pypi tarball has no tests, whereas the github >> tarball has no setup, I choose the latter and added the setup.py with a >> git-dpm/quilt patch. I hope this is correct. I had incorrectly added setup.py to master. In the new repo I removed the setup.py file from the master branch, it is now really added by the patch. This caused some trouble with the auto_clean target which I think I addressed. > Yep, that's fine. Please ask upstream to syncronize both, and have > github ship the setup.py, and the tarball the release. https://github.com/techtonik/python-patch/issues/51 > more changes I ask you: > * d/changelog: > + please kill the second changelog line; first uploads should only > come with a "first upload" line > + finalize it (dch -r) done > * d/control: > + please wrap-and-sort that list of build-deps > + why are you commenting out the Testsuite field? > + Vcs-* are pointing to a repo that's not DPMT's, that's wrong > (furthermore that URL first requires auth, and it gave me a 404, so > I think it's a private repo) done; I have uncommented the testsuite (not sure why it was commented) > * d/compat: > + please bump to 10 (d/control already have the >= 10, so I guess you > just forgot to push this one too) done > * d/rules: > + please repspect DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck should be OK (see below) > + please use the method provided by pybuild to properly run the tests > against all supported python versions, against what you just > "built"; I think that one runs only one python version (2.7) > against the original sources. I have added a test_suite config to setup.py (and moved from distutil to setuptools); this testsuite is then picked up by pybuild, and AFAICT it honors the nocheck flag automatically > + you're overriding dh_auto_install when you only want to append > --install-script to the command invoked. Please use > PYBUILD_INSTALL_ARGS=--install-scripts=... instead. OK > * d/copyright: > + why are you licensing debian/ under a different license? because I prefer GPL for my contributions to Debian > + personally I find a lot more readable to have all the file paragraph > at the top, and all stand alone licenses at the bottom OK > + other/pack.py is under another license OK added a public domain license for that > * I: python-patch: new-package-should-not-package-python2-module python-patch OK I stripped all python2 stuff > + right, I was about to forget about this... > * I: python-patch source: binary-control-field-duplicates-source field "section" in package python-patch OK (solved by the previous one BTW) Thanks for all ! It should be now ready to go. Paolo
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
RFS: python-patch 1.16 Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi@libpf.com> - 2016-11-29 08:30 +0100
Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2016-12-29 18:20 +0100
Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16 Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2017-04-04 19:40 +0200
Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16 Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi@libpf.com> - 2017-04-04 20:00 +0200
Re: RFS: python-patch 1.16 Paolo Greppi <paolo.greppi@libpf.com> - 2017-05-24 11:50 +0200
csiph-web