Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8507
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: pypy pakages |
| Date | Tue, 10 May 2016 20:10:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rxkgx-80L-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rxjXc-7jo-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue May 10 18:02:15 2016 |
| Old-Return-Path | <barry@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-11.88 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate: -5 |
| Organization | The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists |
| X-Mailer | Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/saZczrDlYFmZM//kPn6T9bN"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13836 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160510140155.2acef593.barry@wooz.org |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 61 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 10 May 2016 14:01:55 -0400 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <20160510140155.2acef593.barry@wooz.org> |
| X-Original-References | <1462901013.5276.5.camel@fladi.at> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8507 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On May 10, 2016, at 07:23 PM, Michael Fladischer wrote: >is there a specific reason why there are so few pypy-* packages in the >archive? Is it just a lack of interest or are any practical reasons not >to have them? I don't think there are too many practical reasons other than every package that wants to add PyPy support has to minimally add a binary package section and some build-deps. For bonus, build-time and/or autopkgtests should also be added and of course the whole extra stack needs testing. I just added PyPy support to pyparsing, but mostly because it's a new dependency of setuptools and Doko requested it. I've also submitted a bug and patch to autodep8 to recognize and generate PyPy test suites (#823883). >I just tried to add pypy support to some of my packages and it was a >pretty straight forward thing to do. \o/ >If it's just a lack of interest, would anyone be willing to work with >me to add pypy support to packages that are known to be compatible[0]? JFDI, or do you want reviews of the packaging and/or need sponsorship? Then the question is, what about Jython? I guess we don't (yet) have to care about IronPython. Cheers, -Barry
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
pypy pakages Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at> - 2016-05-10 19:50 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-05-10 20:10 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-05-10 20:20 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2016-05-10 23:30 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2016-05-11 00:20 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-05-11 15:30 +0200
Re: pypy pakages Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2016-05-12 22:10 +0200
csiph-web