Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8465
| From | Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: python debug packages |
| Date | 2016-04-22 19:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rqNdE-5NN-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rqLbQ-419-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 22.04.2016 16:58, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote: > Hi > > Now that debug symbols are automatically generated in -dbgsym packages, > how do you handle the debug > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pppppppp.x86_64-linux-gnu_d.so files? > > They used to go in a generic -dbg package. > > I'm thinking about rrdtool, and it already has a lot of packages: > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/rrdtool > > I'm considering creating a specific python-rrdtool-dbg package. > > Other options I can think of are: > - Put the debug .so file into the main python-rrdtool package no, that would add dependencies on the python-dbg packages by default. > - Do not migrate to new style -dbgsym packages and keep everything in > rrtool-dbg, like it is now. that would be my preferred solution. > - Stop bothering about this debug .so file, and trash it. please don't.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
python debug packages Jean-Michel Vourgère <nirgal@debian.org> - 2016-04-22 17:30 +0200
Re: python debug packages Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2016-04-22 19:40 +0200
Re: python debug packages Iustin Pop <iustin@debian.org> - 2016-05-16 04:30 +0200
Re: python debug packages Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2016-05-17 12:30 +0200
Re: python debug packages Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 11:10 +0200
Re: python debug packages Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 11:20 +0200
Re: python debug packages Ben Finney <bignose@debian.org> - 2016-10-11 12:40 +0200
csiph-web