Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8414
| From | Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: CPython hash randomization makes some Python packages unreproducible |
| Date | 2016-04-11 20:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rmOBl-1DU-45@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rm4RQ-8vg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rm5Ee-LN-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Organization of Unorganized Woozalists |
On Apr 09, 2016, at 08:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >FWIW I think that's a bad idea. A number of packages run their test >suite at build time, and running the tests with hash randomization >enabled seems to me like something we shouldn't give up. Completely agreed. Although we're in the long tail now, during the bulk of the Python 3 transition, we found real bugs when hash randomization was enabled. >Couldn't packages where the binary packages contents depend on the hash seed >just set one themselves? +1 -Barry
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
CPython hash randomization makes some Python packages unreproducible Cara <ceridwen.mailing.lists@gmail.com> - 2016-04-09 19:30 +0200
Re: CPython hash randomization makes some Python packages unreproducible Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org> - 2016-04-09 20:20 +0200
Re: CPython hash randomization makes some Python packages unreproducible Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-04-11 20:20 +0200
csiph-web