Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8402
| From | Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Packaging Grip |
| Date | 2016-04-07 10:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rldaO-RS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <rjfqq-2i4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rkiFA-89A-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl2fo-Yp-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <rl8kO-5xu-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Hi Tiago, On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:37:24PM -0300, Tiago Ilieve wrote: > Thanks for taking the time to explain me this, but actually I got a > little bit confused. Because yes, what you said is consistent with > what I found on articles about Python packaging on wiki.d.o[1][2], but > at the same time there are well-known packages in the archive that > contradicts this, specially the item "3". > > The package that I used as an example is tox. It used to be called > "python-tox", which is now a transitional dummy package[3]. Now is > named "tox"[4], because it is intended to be used as a CLI > application, but at the same time it ships its files in > "dist-packages"[5]. There are always exceptions of course. If the primary use of your package is its command-line interface, and you don't expect other packages in Debian to use its Python API, then shipping everything in one package called grip is probably fine. > I followed the tox example and named the package "grip", not > "python-grip", because I'm standing on the shoulders of giants here. I > don't really know its maintainer, Barry Warsaw, but the guy has both > "@debian.org" and "@python.org" e-mail addresses[6], so he clearly > knows about Debian packaging and the Python ecosystem itself way more > than I do. > > The problem with the item number "4" is that I never got it working as > intended. So every time I have to create my own "/usr/bin/" scripts or > symlinks, discarding those auto-generated entry point scripts. If upstream entry points don't work, then having your own ones is fine. Though in my experience upstream entry points for public packages usually worked. -- Dmitry Shachnev
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Packaging Grip Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-04-02 00:10 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 21:50 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-04-06 22:30 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Tiago Ilieve <tiago.myhro@gmail.com> - 2016-04-07 05:00 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2016-04-07 06:00 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Barry Warsaw <barry@debian.org> - 2016-04-07 16:40 +0200
Re: Packaging Grip Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2016-04-07 10:10 +0200
csiph-web