Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7919

Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports
Date Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:40:02 +0100
Message-ID <qzoBA-1DT-25@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qy6no-6VJ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qypJn-2KZ-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyqvM-3iT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyug2-5Jl-29@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyuSK-6fq-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyvF8-6wU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qyG7x-5tK-59@gated-at.bofh.it> <qz61X-6u1-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <qz6lj-6Q1-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzmT9-uQ-39@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Nov 27 10:31:55 2015
Old-Return-Path <piotr@ozarowski.pl>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-6.979 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8=0.02] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -6.1
Mail-Followup-To debian-python@lists.debian.org
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Operating-System Debian GNU/Linux (3.16.0-4-amd64)
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13234
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20151127103136.GU16403@sar0.p1otr.com
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 53
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:31:36 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <20151127103136.GU16403@sar0.p1otr.com>
X-Original-References <20151123205458.GB16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <56549EC0.7040205@debian.org> <20151124182903.GF16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <5654E438.404@debian.org> <20151124230008.GG16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <5654F7DA.4080802@debian.org> <20151125110750.GH16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <565719F0.6060909@debian.org> <20151126150204.GO16403@sar0.p1otr.com> <565816EA.8080106@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:7919

Show key headers only | View raw


> > python-sphinx is not backported and you didn't mention any patches
> 
> I did backport python-sphinx too. It is present in these packages, and I
> also mentioned it in this list.

you did mention you will backport sphinx. Yes, I missed that and I'm sorry for
that. I did check if it's backported and it still isn't.

> Will do. FYI, I'm still waiting for the removal of
> python-repoze.{what,what-plugins,who-plugins}, which is blocking the
> migration of Keystone, and which therefore makes my efforts useless
> (there's no point of uploading OpenStack without keystone). So for the
> moment, my uploads are stalled.

what's blocking you with sphinx?

> Unless you want to maintain the backports yourself: no. This is not a
> hijack anyway, you're the only one calling it this way.

I don't have time for it now and I don't want additional work caused by
you (sorry, I still don't trust you, not anymore).

Note that even if it "officially" is somewhere else (or is it not?) -
I will get all the DAK emails and bugs. Ubuntu fixed the fist part by
changing Maintainer to a mailing list. It doesn't solve the bugs issue
in our BTS (which is more annoying).

The easiest way is to simply play nice with current maintainer. I asked
you for changes you want to upload and you didn't provide them until
yesterday (and there's a difference between "just a rebuild" and "just a
rebuild with backported other build dependencies") - I could easily read
that from f.e. build logs or resulting binaries (which you didn't
originally provide).

> On 11/26/2015 09:42 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> > Building and uploading in the right order was always the plan,
> > right?
> 
> Building in the right order is necessary for checking that

you realize some packages will have to go though NEW and sphinx is one of them?

> (build-)dependencies are satisfied, yes. Though I don't think I actually
> need to upload in a specific order: I can push all at once if it is
> within a single dak run (if I'm wrong here, let me know).

if you upload A that doesn't have to go through NEW and new B that A build
depends on, A is broken.
(if all of them will end up in NEW, ftp-masters will take care of that)
-- 
Piotr Ożarowski                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl          www.griffith.cc           www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 09:30 +0100
  Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 09:40 +0100
    Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 18:20 +0100
      Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 22:00 +0100
        Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 18:40 +0100
          Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 19:30 +0100
            Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 23:30 +0100
              Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-25 00:10 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-25 01:00 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-25 12:10 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 15:50 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 16:10 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 16:20 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 20:20 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 21:40 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-11-27 09:30 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 20:30 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 21:50 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-27 09:50 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-27 11:40 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-27 13:10 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> - 2015-11-28 12:20 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 09:30 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 09:40 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports IOhannes m zmölnig (Debian/GNU)  <umlaeute@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 10:00 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 10:50 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Tristan Seligmann <mithrandi@mithrandi.net> - 2015-11-26 14:40 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 15:10 +0100
                Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-26 15:30 +0100
    Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 09:30 +0100
      Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Sandro Tosi <sandro.tosi@gmail.com> - 2015-11-24 09:40 +0100
        Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 10:30 +0100
          Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 13:40 +0100
            Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 22:40 +0100
          Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Bernd Zeimetz <bernd@bzed.de> - 2015-12-06 20:20 +0100
      Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 09:40 +0100
  Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> - 2015-11-23 12:50 +0100
    Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 18:20 +0100
  Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 13:50 +0100
    Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> - 2015-11-23 18:20 +0100
      Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 10:40 +0100
  Re: Pushing a bunch of packages to jessie-backports Vincent Bernat <bernat@debian.org> - 2015-11-24 09:10 +0100

csiph-web