Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7929

Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)

From Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)
Date 2015-11-29 01:30 +0100
Message-ID <qzY2l-7wl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qzGRQ-58S-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzS6B-3Sw-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzWMV-6Qr-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <qzXfX-707-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization Debian

Show all headers | View raw


Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> writes:

> API/ABI transitions (such as switching default Python 3 to be PYthon
> 3.5) are managed by the release team, with a workflow described at
> <URL:https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions>.

There is https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html

Still trying to work out what the "Dependency level n" headers mean.

What are the implications of the "Collisions" section? Looks like
packages in multiple transitions.

Are the orange packages a problem or not? So if the build is failing on
a platform it will get an orange status as well as if it doesn't meet
the good or bad criteria.

If I understand this correctly, all packages as part of the transition
get uploaded to experimental, and then get moved at once to unstable?

Unfortunately the
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.5.html page doesn't
indicate if somebody is already working on the package or not.

I would have thought binNMU would be sufficient for some of these
packages, however maybe these easy targets have already been fixed now?

> Have a read through the log for bug#798999 and see whether they're
> waiting on something we can help with.

Not that I can see. So maybe that means any of the red packages on the
transition tracking page.

Some of the packages look like they are broken with no immediate fix,
maybe should get removed from unstable *if* inclusion in unstable is
holding up the transition. e.g. openturns.
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2015-11-28 07:10 +0100
  Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> - 2015-11-28 19:10 +0100
    Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5 Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 00:10 +0100
      Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is  Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that  requires 3.5) Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-11-29 00:40 +0100
        Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3  is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python  that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 01:30 +0100
          Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5) Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2015-11-29 01:50 +0100
            Re: Which bug report is tracking the “python3  is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python  that requires 3.5) Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2015-11-29 02:50 +0100

csiph-web