Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #8046

Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie...

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie...
Date Sat, 02 Jan 2016 00:40:02 +0100
Message-ID <qMhsC-um-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <qLleW-4KR-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLleW-4KR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <qLm1k-5j3-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To Ant Dude <ant@zimage.com>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Fri Jan 1 23:33:12 2016
Old-Return-Path <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-7.699 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight NOT_IN_SBL_XBL_SPAMHAUS=-1.5 NOT_IN_BL_NJABL=-1.5 CL_IP_EQ_HELO_IP=-2 (check from: .microcomaustralia. - helo: .mail-pa0-x234.google. - helo-domain: .google.) FROM/MX_MATCHES_NOT_HELO(DOMAIN)=0; rate: -5
Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microcomaustralia.com.au; s=google; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:organization:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=r5lxXwfP5QHhWpyLE6Qa8orHC0+MOiXvcOtRszQ0gvw=; b=d9j/TZ1RVnjY+xDyiwdxzagkFLckPYwKtu/MIF4eA5f6fQoQqkEzs4GGVjzexHQoxA UFrMbdIyL+a8pJsjGtX8hT1ffw2Vrk1KlEL8ydxv+nhO5Vte3gyyfQJUZOXi8pNmWyAg iTZUI/Ojve3u7g+Z00E4sHr45e0rYplqhVSUM=
X-Google-Dkim-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :organization:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; bh=r5lxXwfP5QHhWpyLE6Qa8orHC0+MOiXvcOtRszQ0gvw=; b=I+hxconvdtm0cS8zd8UBGWc3N4TYjlX1bOaaVFx0I8HzYMXwU6zdDMDOdyUQW5RlD6 NdjrL8lgwwgIEsr4YvpZcNLC1+HxOWxph8/z0EAK6CfBnb9d4+k5dUrBnHgVI8B1tbk8 ucwuRF2XA/KqddNPaov+0+I5Hiwts6iO1t9cskM6/DlUQ82N+3UhNKbsOtlEcpl2whS+ eXe7SPqc4yLMBx74DxDnwBgJg7/Ng1hIFw70jilkZsm9MWGFxBNkSy061Z1CAlvdbuee XaQY61mLxStWIxBWajQXt8TWzoa0joi9Sn6z0Ur28qq1o4cBp0EDIdv9iJnFu0UQOGph IdoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State ALoCoQkvEC0Hp1N/SbQnN8jGCH257etZy3r79cdYQ+kYaF96joFF8iXseCfflwxHEXzSo9iGqVAVw+xGyLr6nUgjI6GqoGYR7A==
X-Received by 10.66.190.7 with SMTP id gm7mr51892925pac.79.1451691175389; Fri, 01 Jan 2016 15:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
Organization Debian
User-Agent Notmuch/0.18.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/13364
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/87r3i0q3j1.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 16
X-Original-Cc debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date Sat, 02 Jan 2016 10:32:50 +1100
X-Original-Message-ID <87r3i0q3j1.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
X-Original-References <56830BEC.60501@earthlink.net> <87wprwp9w3.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <20151230095411.GA13869@beta.zimage.com>
X-Original-Sender Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:8046

Show key headers only | View raw

Ant Dude <ant@zimage.com> writes:

>> In short, it isn't recommended practise to use pip install with Debian,
>> except for inside a virtualenv (or similar), as the packages can
>> conflict with Debian packages - especially after a upgrade.
>
> Interesting. I did find a fix and it seems like others had the same 
> problem. FFrom Debian's forum, it said 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=744145#31 -- rm -rf 
> /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/requests* I renamed request 
> directory and now can run Debian's pip command. Sheesh. I also notice it 
> is an old bug that is still not fixed. :(

Are you sure? This bug was supposedly fixed in the Jessie version...
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz> - 2015-12-30 10:30 +0100
  Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after  upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Ant Dude <ant@zimage.com> - 2015-12-30 11:20 +0100
    Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-01-02 00:40 +0100
      Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after  upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Ant Dude <ant@zimage.com> - 2016-01-02 01:00 +0100
      Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Daniele Tricoli <eriol@mornie.org> - 2016-01-02 16:40 +0100
        Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after  upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Ant Dude <ant@zimage.com> - 2016-01-02 17:40 +0100
          Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after  upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Andrey Rahmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2016-01-02 18:40 +0100
        Re: [Python-modules-team] My Pip installation is broken after upgrading Debian from oldstable/Wheezy to stable/Jessie... Brian May <bam@debian.org> - 2016-01-03 00:40 +0100

csiph-web