Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #7137

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?

From	Daniel Stender <debian@danielstender.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional?
Date	2015-07-22 16:10 +0200
Message-ID	<pP2SB-Cp-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<pOLf5-yk-41@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOMb9-1TR-23@gated-at.bofh.it> <pON7c-3eW-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <pOXge-10m-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <pP2zg-8rx-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 22.07.2015 15:45, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> 
>> [Yaroslav Halchenko, 2015-07-21]
>>> As I have mentioned some tools might not be smart about empty values
>>> in http_proxy, try e.g. git-annex under such settings 
> 
>> ah, sorry, I only quickly scanned you email.
> 
>> I already followed Dimitri's suggestion to add no_proxy=localhost and
>> will add your PYBUILD_FAKE_PROXY later today
> 
> awesome!  feel free to tune the name to whatever you feel more appropriate.
> Just an additional piece of support to allow simply disabling automatic
> assignment of fake proxies and that no_proxy doesn't work for some
> libs/packages: Daniel Stender tried export no_proxy=localhost on pytest-tornado
> without success.

... pytest-localserver currently (in the multiple package dep solving approach for vcr.py),
dh-python 2.20150719.

DS

-- 
http://www.danielstender.com/blog/
4096R/DF5182C8
46CB 1CA8 9EA3 B743 7676 1DB9 15E0 9AF4 DF51 82C8



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55AFA0EC.5070705@danielstender.com

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> - 2015-07-22 10:10 +0200
  Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com> - 2015-07-22 15:50 +0200
    Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Daniel Stender <debian@danielstender.com> - 2015-07-22 16:10 +0200
    Re: pybuild and proxies -- could we make "prohibition" optional? Dimitri John Ledkov <dimitri.ledkov@surgut.co.uk> - 2015-07-27 23:40 +0200

csiph-web