Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17472
| Path | csiph.com!pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!srl.newsdeef.eu!news.corradoroberto.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Question regarding binaries in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ |
| Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:00:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <MN7rj-hrCl-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <MN6Yh-hrqS-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Apr 23 18:53:25 2026 |
| Old-Return-Path | <wrar@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-12 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| X-Policyd-Weight | using cached result; rate:hard: -3.5 |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZSuXURXoSP4oNhI/" |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23749 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aepqkv4xo0WpXRwd@belkar.wrar.name |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 68 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2026 23:53:06 +0500 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <aepqkv4xo0WpXRwd@belkar.wrar.name> |
| X-Original-References | <6743094.KJgs85P2H9@soren-desktop> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17472 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Thu, Apr 23, 2026 at 11:09:57AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: >X: python3-pyinstaller: executable-in-usr-lib [usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ >PyInstaller/bootloader/Linux-64bit-intel/run] >X: python3-pyinstaller: executable-in-usr-lib [usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ >PyInstaller/bootloader/Linux-64bit-intel/run_d] >I do not know how easy it would be to relocate these files. Before reaching >out to the Pyinstaller upstream to see of what it would take to relocate these >files, I wanted to ask the Debian Python Team how this is generally handled >with Python packages. I don't think there is any need to "generally handle this", to be honest. > Are executables typically relocated to /usr/libexec/? Executables are typically generated in /usr/bin directly. Just as executable helpers suitable for libexec are rare in general and even more rare in libraries, they must be very rare in Python library packages so I wouldn't be surprised if this situation have never occured in Debian packages at all. On the other hand, shipping data of various kinds in dist-packages/ is relatively popular and usually tolerated. This seems to be similar to it, and to be honest I would make sure these executables are meant to be executed at all, as opposed to being included into the pyinstaller output (see "bootloader"), before e.g. contacting the upstream (or the DPT, but that's too late). -- WBR, wRAR
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Question regarding binaries in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-04-23 20:30 +0200
Re: Question regarding binaries in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2026-04-23 21:00 +0200
Re: Question regarding binaries in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/ Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2026-04-23 21:10 +0200
csiph-web