Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17462

Re: review for beets/2.8.0-1

Path csiph.com!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From "Pieter Lenaerts" <plenae@disroot.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: review for beets/2.8.0-1
Date Sat, 11 Apr 2026 10:00:01 +0200
Message-ID <MIBq1-ehp0-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <MGrXP-cQyU-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MI3ol-dUrJ-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To "Jeroen Ploemen" <jcfp@debian.org>, "Pieter Lenaerts" <plenae@disroot.org>
X-Mailbox-Line From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Sat Apr 11 07:54:21 2026
Old-Return-Path <plenae@disroot.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status No, score=-12.198 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Policyd-Weight using cached result; rate: -4.6
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type multipart/signed; boundary=7a5bc5b97d78f3402ca8a8e1f321eab27783f8fe5bd533c901eda345feb6; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Mailing-List <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23737
List-ID <debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/DHQ5WAEYJ0MR.1FBIRWV16Q3ON@disroot.org
Approved robomod@news.nic.it
Lines 61
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
X-Original-Date Sat, 11 Apr 2026 08:53:58 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID <DHQ5WAEYJ0MR.1FBIRWV16Q3ON@disroot.org>
X-Original-References <DHL43NDXIS56.17H5OXMRFI856@disroot.org> <20260409193831.01eecfbf@debian.org>
Xref csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17462

Show key headers only | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu Apr 9, 2026 at 8:38 PM BST, Jeroen Ploemen wrote:

Hi Jeroen,

> I took a look at the beets package, up for sponsorship in the Python
> team:

Thanks for your time! Again ;-)

> * repo: upstream and pristine-tar branches are stale. Try 'gbp push'.
> * control: most version requirements in both build-depends and the
>   dependencies of the binary package are ancient (as in, already met
>   in oldstable), please remove the outdated constraints.
> * control: missing field 'Built-Using: ${sphinxdoc:Built-Using}' on
>   the documentation pkg (please ignore lintian if it complains about
>   adding such a field on an architecture-independent package, known
>   bug).
> * control: the pkg is missing a hard dependency on python3-pil for the
>   unconditional imports in beets/util/artresizer.py (currently only a
>   suggest).

All these are done.

Additionally, I saw some of the BPD tests failed again in the i386 build step.
I feel I'm continually trying to patch these up, disabling them, checking if
the patch is still needed, enabling them again, and so on.

It seems pointless to resist: upstream doesn't support py 3.14 yet.

So I've disabled tests on py 3.14 at module level now when I get errors on py
3.14 but not on 3.13.

> Once the above comments have been addressed, simply re-add the
> package to the IRC channel topic and/or ping me by e-mail.

I see salsa pipelines seem to be in trouble. Package builds fine in sbuild
locally here.

Br,

Pieter

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

review for beets/2.8.0-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2026-04-09 21:40 +0200
  Re: review for beets/2.8.0-1 "Pieter Lenaerts" <plenae@disroot.org> - 2026-04-11 10:00 +0200

csiph-web