Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17274
| From | c.buhtz@posteo.jp |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release |
| Date | 2025-12-18 09:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <M3hId-3MKy-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <M0NEC-23X3-45@gated-at.bofh.it> <M3cfv-3IPU-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M3d1T-3Jvo-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hello Soren and Thomas, thank you very much for your feedback and kind words. Even this is somehow helpful for me and my mood. In my understanding the DPT would take over the package but only if the current maintainer says OK to it. Anyway. The maintainer is not inactive but only not responsive. I think I need to live with it. I need to monitor the situation even further. I also think that upstream maintainers shouldn't do Debian maintenance also. An upstream maintainer is IMHO not objective enough. But I also know this is not reality today. I can speak only for myself I shouldn't do both jobs. To risky to introduce or break things by accident. Regards, Christian Buhtz
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-12-11 13:10 +0100
Re: [backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-12-18 03:50 +0100
Re: [backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release Thomas Ward <teward@ubuntu.com> - 2025-12-18 04:40 +0100
Re: [backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-12-18 09:40 +0100
Re: [backintime] Advise about unresponsive DPM and new 1.5.6 release Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-12-19 01:40 +0100
csiph-web