Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17228

Re: Weird status of pdm

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: Weird status of pdm
Date	Thu, 04 Dec 2025 23:50:01 +0100
Message-ID	<LYqj7-pze-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LYeL0-hQ5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> <LYkQp-lRT-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 4 22:48:25 2025
Old-Return-Path	<sanvila@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition	inline
X-Debian-User	sanvila
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23462
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aTIPpWOcaRtysyQ1@nuc
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	27
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Date	Thu, 4 Dec 2025 23:48:05 +0100
X-Original-Message-ID	<aTIPpWOcaRtysyQ1@nuc>
X-Original-References	<aTFh0WohCRHh-9Hd@nuc> <3422689.da0VxnkfJ1@soren-desktop>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17228

Show key headers only | View raw

[ trimming Cc list ]

On Thu, Dec 04, 2025 at 09:59:28AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:

> You have a number of tests that are failing on the buildds.
> 
> One of the differences between the buildds and Salsa CI is that the buildds do 
> not allow any internet access during build, whereas Salsa CI does not enforce 
> that.  So, the first place I would recommend looking is to see if the tests 
> that are failing require internet access.
> 
> If that is the case, you can disable just those tests during the build, while 
> enabling them in autopkgtest (which does allow internet access).
> 
> If these tests do not require internet access, then you might dig deeper into 
> the error message for each test to see why they are failing.

Thanks a lot, there is indeed an upstream commit regarding network
access, which I will try next, because it will disable at least some
of the failing tests.

[ However, both the buildd network and Salsa CI recently switched to
  sbuild+unshare and neither of them currently allow network access,
  so it is certainly surprising that they do not behave the same
  in this respect ].

Thanks.

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 11:30 +0100
  Re: Weird status of pdm Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 18:00 +0100
    Re: Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 23:50 +0100

csiph-web