Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17227

Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1

Path	csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod
From	Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.maint.python
Subject	Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1
Date	Thu, 04 Dec 2025 18:30:02 +0100
Message-ID	<LYljs-mii-11@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LWqGB-gBQ3-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LWS9P-gWOP-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LXg2t-hcIe-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <LY7q9-cQ5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
X-Original-To	Mahangu Weerasinghe <mahangu@gmail.com>
X-Mailbox-Line	From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 4 17:28:42 2025
Old-Return-Path	<jcfp@debian.org>
X-Amavis-Spam-Status	No, score=-114.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
X-Mailer	Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/B0vNVnv+.FoI8gvIJWC_voc"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Debian-User	jcfp
X-Mailing-List	<debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23461
List-ID	<debian-python.lists.debian.org>
List-URL	<https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/>
List-Archive	https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20251204172823.62b5b90f@debian.org
Approved	robomod@news.nic.it
Lines	50
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway
Sender	robomod@news.nic.it
X-Original-Cc	debian-python@lists.debian.org
X-Original-Date	Thu, 4 Dec 2025 17:28:23 -0000
X-Original-Message-ID	<20251204172823.62b5b90f@debian.org>
X-Original-References	<20251129104928.530c2227@debian.org> <CACe4y=8kyv_KLRqQRtUvSeunnZmhLUbWQMaqwLp5YO+5N1_UaA@mail.gmail.com> <20251201173704.6056319c@debian.org> <CACe4y=9X=Uk0fXJdGKbAi=tqK9yJzd3ua9XJtYASGzyrsfHXgA@mail.gmail.com>
Xref	csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17227

Show key headers only | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

hi Mahangu,

was doing some last minute checks before upload when I noticed these:

* for datasette/static/table.js, the file in missing-sources seems to
  be identical to the one in the orig tarball - neither is minified,
  it just has a long line that triggers the lintian hit. So there's
  no need for this to make an appearance in missing-sources.

* datasette/static/codemirror-5.57.0.min.css on the other hand is
  actually minified, but not present in d/missing-sources. I guess
  lintian only looks for certain types of files, and css isn't among
  them. Anyway, the original appears to live at [1] (and probably
  somewhere in a codemirror tarball as well).


I also changed the stack limit to cover all 32 bit archs, since
there's a few ports that are also 32 bit (sh4, mk68, etc.), and did
some housekeeping to trim down long lines in d/rules and remove
overrides made redundant by other changes.


[1]https://github.com/codemirror/codemirror5/blob/master/lib/codemirror.css

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-11-29 11:50 +0100
  Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Mahangu Weerasinghe <mahangu@gmail.com> - 2025-11-30 17:10 +0100
    Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-12-01 18:40 +0100
      Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Mahangu Weerasinghe <mahangu@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 03:40 +0100
        Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Jeroen Ploemen <jcfp@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 18:30 +0100
          Re: review for datasette/0.65.2-1 Mahangu Weerasinghe <mahangu@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 08:10 +0100

csiph-web