Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17223
| Path | csiph.com!pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!news.samoylyk.net!gothmog.csi.it!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Weird status of pdm |
| Date | Thu, 04 Dec 2025 11:30:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <LYeL0-hQ5-21@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Thu Dec 4 10:27:00 2025 |
| Old-Return-Path | <sanvila@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-109.51 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Disposition | inline |
| X-Debian-User | sanvila |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23457 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/aTFh0WohCRHh-9Hd@nuc |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 18 |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | Graham Inggs <ginggs@debian.org> |
| X-Original-Date | Thu, 4 Dec 2025 11:26:25 +0100 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <aTFh0WohCRHh-9Hd@nuc> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:17223 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Hello. I would like to get some help with "pdm". The package builds fine in salsa ci: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pdm/-/pipelines but it fails in the buildds: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pdm Recently, Graham Inggs told me that many python packages are expected to FTBFS during the transition (to avoid MBF for issues that will fix by themselves), so I wonder if this is one of them or not. I feel that there must be something subtle about this case and I don't know what it could be. Thanks.
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar
Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 11:30 +0100
Re: Weird status of pdm Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 18:00 +0100
Re: Weird status of pdm Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org> - 2025-12-04 23:50 +0100
csiph-web