Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #17133

Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

From Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.maint.python
Subject Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED
Date 2025-11-09 13:30 +0100
Message-ID <LPcIp-bEvW-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <LP2g2-bxi4-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP2g2-bxi4-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP2g2-bxi4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP489-byDc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LP54d-bzfC-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, Nov 08, 2025 at 08:49:48PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
> I apologize if I did not make it clear from the original email.  They do not, in fact, depend on each other.  Rather, there is a pure Python module that can be used by other programs (in fact, the purpose in packaging it is for Electrum to use the Python module) and an optional executable installed in /usr/bin.  The Python module does not depend on the executable utility, but the executable utility does depend on the Python module (a one-way dependency, not a two-way dependency on each other).

They do:

| Package: keepkeyctl
| Source: python-keepkey
| Depends: python3:any, python3-keepkey (= 7.2.1+dfsg-1)

> If these two packages were merged, it would result in a python3-foo package installing an executable in /usr/bin.  My understanding is that is not the Debian convention, and python3-foo packages should only install Python modules.  However, if my understanding is incorrect, then I don’t have any problem combining them into one binary package.

And there is no problem with installing an executable along the library.

Bastian

-- 
Respect is a rational process
		-- McCoy, "The Galileo Seven", stardate 2822.3

Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 02:20 +0100
  Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 04:20 +0100
    Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> - 2025-11-09 05:20 +0100
      Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-11-09 07:50 +0100
        Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 15:40 +0100
        Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> - 2025-11-13 17:20 +0100
          Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-13 19:10 +0100
            Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-11-20 23:00 +0100
      Re: python-keepkey_7.2.1+dfsg-1_amd64.changes REJECTED Bastian Blank <waldi@debian.org> - 2025-11-09 13:30 +0100

csiph-web