Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #16937
| Path | csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!bofh.it!news.nic.it!robomod |
|---|---|
| From | Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> |
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) |
| Date | Tue, 17 Jun 2025 23:20:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <KYLSN-bhdK-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <KYLSN-bhdK-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KXAPL-ax40-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <KYqlj-b3KD-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <KYysx-b8KH-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| X-Original-To | debian-python@lists.debian.org |
| X-Mailbox-Line | From debian-python-request@lists.debian.org Tue Jun 17 21:18:58 2025 |
| Old-Return-Path | <soren@debian.org> |
| X-Amavis-Spam-Status | No, score=-117.416 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3 tests=[BAYES_00=-2, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-2.907, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, LDO_WHITELIST=-5, PGPSIGNATURE=-5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, USER_IN_DKIM_WELCOMELIST=-0.01, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no |
| Organization | Debian |
| Face | iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAFVBMVEWIg4F7bGiws7ReTkyy kYoXFRrd6/4yMA0PAAACaklEQVQ4y22TwXabMBBFJaPuNZGSNZZp1uhM6BpkJeu4VFk3bsL/f0Lf CHC6qHyOgbl68zTDoIwaVfh3tUopTUGpbFToDiFnY9IY2oMAZYMiS4R9SfbSXepSS5EcFAa/muIU aRj8mkoUqrEraFzhYegBmqig0LyCIyM8DAwPlpBqmJVYaD2UeWZ3abVjsqKIojg+hY4omsyIcNSi qIBM6jJWOveS6kvBeVvHJ+VYzJUW88RmA12UiBx3HEcUMRuzIZI6tBQovTrPclNB3AuUXoXvs0XY C3B2baJpW4Dn2ZpVMInCirkxoyhM1qpK5nFrO65QvCrCqql2DyPgvm94iMQz5/PmISuEotxQGMD5 M5G1N9CjXJ5HQH96BZG2xx6AzejYZccxT4Re3Zr4bPKkCcGcz5Or3dVEABkAUY/znnVcQVVkrXVU vomoEJFe7x4nQuaZmZELL6qnXZGIB5YV/Q2IogtSmyNybEcBX2+QCLOAQYm+gmoORUrYzV7dc6R2 T1WPm45oVEQqsjtoIovHyTmcyxMhVVxTqapomZyLlAmTKC9AmjgamXXGZo+epNrXO3wGGiPRHbKL FnMy2RRgRb1gzFXXGjhICp8wqaTtdtyQH6nWTfkatJvJJoUCbOjSC7wR9/naEVognxrOFdLh7Ugx QpA/0QT4pRV0+u2dqsXD5y9EBDjVAJS3ZZLxmZblgmsU8x7mBeCKg48Py7WU2IiH1epbEbC8K9Ms y0cpcySVUcdQVrBY+rEsv+XpYgFKXT8B3v2yATxv8fKK2EfC358tsIMLYqfD401xA0j1EY4P/wWf IbhlOWyBv4OQsywBM8MAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart159110930.7YDyUoj3Kj"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Debian-User | soren |
| X-Mailing-List | <debian-python@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/23069 |
| List-ID | <debian-python.lists.debian.org> |
| List-URL | <https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/> |
| List-Archive | https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/2838903.Nya5fj1elA@soren-desktop |
| Approved | robomod@news.nic.it |
| Lines | 133 |
| Sender | robomod@news.nic.it |
| X-Original-Cc | c.buhtz@posteo.jp |
| X-Original-Date | Tue, 17 Jun 2025 14:18:30 -0700 |
| X-Original-Message-ID | <2838903.Nya5fj1elA@soren-desktop> |
| X-Original-References | <4bKKVr01S2z6tyB@submission01.posteo.de> <aFCMuw7LkOiBzAgs@belkar.wrar.name> <b69861b611c467fda735a167dccd7d0d@posteo.de> |
| Xref | csiph.com linux.debian.maint.python:16937 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Monday, June 16, 2025 11:56:19 PM Mountain Standard Time c.buhtz@posteo.jp wrote: > Hello Andrey, > > Am 16.06.2025 23:29 schrieb Andrey Rakhmatullin: > > That's expected, so what did you want to know when you asked "how to > > proceed further"? > > I just want to be sure that there is no other Debian-like process or > channel > where to put such requests in, e.g. a ticket against a pseudo-package or > something like this. It is not easy for outsiders like me. > > So it seems this list was the correct place and there is no other > channel. > And I can do nothing else than waiting. > > Thank you for the answers. > Regards, > Christian The thing you need to understand about Debian is that it has a strong package- ownership model. That means that very few things happen without the package maintainers being involved and other Debian Developers are reticent to step on the package maintainers’ toes. Typically, for the software I package, I try to develop strong relationships with the upstream developers. If I were ever contacted by an upstream developer stating that an important fix should be shipped in the Debian on an expedited schedule, I would do everything possible to make it happen. I do no know why you have not had this experience with the maintainers of your package this time. Perhaps they are very busy and haven’t seen your communications. Or perhaps they have lost interest in contributing to Debian. Or perhaps they are ill. As far as I know, none of them have responded negatively to your suggestion of an update. Debian has a couple of procedures for dealing with packages whose maintainers are absent or unresponsive. The least invasive is an NMU (Non-Maintainer Upload). The most invasive is package Salvaging (becoming the new maintainer). Both of these require extra steps and delayed time compared to the maintainer updating the package. As stated earlier, Debian Developers tend to be fairly reticent to step on other developer’s toes. And, in addition, most are fairly busy and don’t have a lot of bandwidth to take on any new tasks. The result of this is that often a package has to languish for several years before someone else picks it up. As an upstream developer, you only have a few basic options when dealing with this unfavorable situation. 1. Do the Debian packaging yourself (that is what I personally do). As you already mentioned, Debian packaging is a surprisingly complicated task. It took me three months of reading documentation before I was ready to start working on my first package, and another three months after that before I could produce usable results (and years later I am still learning all types of new things about doing it well). 2. Wait for a response--which might or might not ever come--from those who have maintained the package in the past. 3. Wait for some other package maintainer to take over maintenance of the package. None of these are ideal. The ideal would be that every package is maintained by an active and involved maintainer who responds in a timely manner to every bug report and every upstream release. The ideal is also that Debian has a surplus of developers that have enough time to make sure that nothing falls through the cracks. I try to always be in the middle of mentoring one or two new developers to move us in that direction. -- Soren Stoutner soren@debian.org
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
[src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2025-06-14 17:20 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Emmanuel Arias <eamanu@debian.org> - 2025-06-14 22:40 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) <c.buhtz@posteo.jp> - 2025-06-16 07:50 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-16 13:40 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Carsten Schoenert <c.schoenert@t-online.de> - 2025-06-16 15:10 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-16 15:30 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-06-16 19:30 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-16 23:20 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-06-16 23:50 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-17 09:00 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org> - 2025-06-17 16:00 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-06-17 00:20 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-17 09:00 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-06-17 09:10 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org> - 2025-06-17 09:50 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) c.buhtz@posteo.jp - 2025-06-17 09:50 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-06-17 23:20 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Nick Morrott <knowledgejunkie@gmail.com> - 2025-06-17 23:50 +0200
Re: [src:backintime] Upload despite Hard Freeze (no response from maintainer/uploader) Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-06-18 00:00 +0200
csiph-web